Surely this is just 6GB per GPU? If so, then it's a 6GB card, not 12GB. Reallygetting tired of this marketing fluff of quoting RAM capacities of dual-GPU cardsas being the sum of the RAM for each GPU. Doesn't work that way. Unless ofcourse this is a different configuration entirely, like a single shared 12GB pool,but that's very unlikely (otherwise, the PR would have made a lot more noiseabout such a thing). As for those moaning about price, etc., it's not aimed atgamers, period, so please give it a rest. It's for solo-professionals and SMBswho can't afford Tesla but want something better for dp compute and largeRAM. It still lacks various features of Tesla, but the appeal is obvious if youunderstand the market subtleties, which many here clearly don't.Ian.It has 6GB per GPU, and thus on a dual GPU card it has 12, it is just a condensed version two GTX Titans on the same PCB. I personally don't like these cards, and they are not liked for a reason. Too much power draw to a single device (even if its multiple cards (technically) the power goes to the same spot), and more importantly they always run way to hot and loud. And no, it is not meant for gaming, at least not in a usual sense. The only gaming function anyone in their right mind would spend this much for is development. The head room for future proofing is minimal, the amount of VRAM doesn't help, and by the time it would, we would already have faster and more efficient VRAM for our GPU's. So all in all, its really cool, but please, real PC gamers don't play on their laptops so give us something we can use in desktop at a price we can afford. Preferably before the end of 2015.