Gigabyte Aivia Uranium Wireless Gaming Mouse Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

jankeke

Distinguished
Dec 16, 2011
134
0
18,680
0
Nice review !But on the 2nd page, 9th § you wrote :This is another place where Gigabyte's Aivia Uranium offers good economics.I guess it should say :This is another place where Gigabyte's Aivia Uranium offers good ergonomics.
 

Phillip Wager

Honorable
May 30, 2013
69
0
10,640
1
this just does not seem worth the high price. it just seems like too much of an office mouse than a gaming mouse honestly thats marketed for gamers.
 

atavax

Distinguished
Jan 6, 2012
105
2
18,690
1
I don't understand why you think heavy is ok for low sensitivity and bad for high sensitivity. It is quite the opposite. Low sensitivity means you are moving your mouse way more and lifting your mouse way more, which means heft is a big problem. While many high sensitivity players move their mouse very little and many actually prefer heavy mice.
 

atavax

Distinguished
Jan 6, 2012
105
2
18,690
1
Also many low sensitivity players use 400 or 450 dpi. the lowest native step being 800 is not good for low sensitivity players.5600 DPI is ridiculously high. Almost all professional shooter players use below 1000 dpi. The higher the max dpi, the more smoothing is needed to be built into the mouse to counter jitter, the laggier the mouse is. Any mouse above 3,000 dpi is not taking high level mouse performance seriously.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS