Good Gaming Pc

[GamerStuff61]

i want to play next gen games with the gaming pc i wan't to build but can i play on high settings. How much FPS could i get when i play with high settings? And how much with medium?


these are the specs:
Cooler Master CM 500 Force, black
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor 3.5 GHz LGA 1150 BX80646I54690K
MSI Z97-G43 (Socket 1150-Intel Z97- ATX DDR3 VGA)
Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3 1600 MHz (PC3 12 800) Desktop Memory (CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9)
EVGA GeForce GTX 970 Super Clocked ACX 2.0 4GB GDDR5 Graphics Card
Seagate 1TB Desktop HDD SATA 6Gb / s 64MB Cache 3.5 Inch Internal Bare Drive (ST1000DM003)
by Seagate
Corsair Builder Series CX 600 Watt ATX / EPS 80 PLUS (CX600)
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-75E1T0B / AM)

 

[UrbanZyrx]

This is a solid build, I can't say specifically what fps you will get because it depends on the game. However your more then likely going to be able to play majority of games on high settings while achieving 60fps.

I would strongly suggest switching that PSU for something better. EVGA G2 or GS series is a good start, I would suggest something around the 650-750w range in case our interested in SLI in the future.

http://ca.pcpartpicker.com/part/evga-power-supply-220gs0650v1
http://ca.pcpartpicker.com/part/evga-power-supply-220g20750xr

 

[logainofhades]

Motherboard is not very good choice. Stick with SLI capable motherboards with at least 6 phase power, preferably 8. Change the PSU to a Tier 1 or Tier 2 unit. CX PSU's are not good quality units. http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-2547993/psu-tier-list.html 120gb SSD isn't really going to hold much. I wouldn't go below a 250gb.

 

[KNARF XD]

i would suggest to get a 390 instead of a 970, 390 performs better, but it needs at least a 650w psu and has a higher heat output

 

[logainofhades]

The 390 typically only runs better, than a GTX 970, at resolutions of 1440p and higher. 1080p not so much.

 

[KNARF XD]

The 390 typically only runs better, than a GTX 970, at resolutions of 1440p and higher. 1080p not so much.

at least on par, only a few where the 970 pulls ahead, but the 390 is the better card in more games. not only that, but what about dx12 and async shaders?

 

[logainofhades]

Maxwell 2.0 ( GTX 960 and higher) support a higher level of DX 12, than AMD cards do. http://wccftech.com/nvidia-amd-directx-12-graphic-card-list-features-explained/3/

 

[KNARF XD]

Maxwell 2.0 ( GTX 960 and higher) support a higher level of DX 12, than AMD cards do. http://wccftech.com/nvidia-amd-directx-12-graphic-card-list-features-explained/3/

*sight*
seriously dude? did you just rediscovered the internet? look at the dx 12 benches... (mostly AotS, that first api overhead bench or fable legends (rumored to be gimped so nvidia didnt get crushed) ) and all the articles about any lack of async of any nvidia gpu's.
the only thing the 970 has over the 390 is lower power consuption/ higher efficiency

ps. the 950 is lower than the 960 and is also maxwell 2.0
pps. don't forget the lack of optimization for maxwell when pascal arrives