Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner (
More info?)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:09:08 GMT in alt.comp.periphs.scanner, "CSM1"
<nomoremail@nomail.com> wrote:
>"Luca" <niente@spam.it> wrote in message
>news:_z6Td.48157$QG6.856483@twister2.libero.it...
>> i am looking for a good and fast scanner for ocr work, using Finereader 6
>> or 7
>> Any suggestion?
>>
>Any scanner that can scan at 300 to 600 dpi in B&W, Gray Scale and/or color
>and handle the paper size will do to produce a image that can be OCRed.
>
>Even the cheapest scanner you can buy will work for OCR.
>
>OCR software makes a huge difference in the results.
>Some OCR software does a very poor job.
>
>The best OCR software is only about 99% accurate.
The best OCR software is very expensive.
COTS retail OCR software packages are only about 90% accurate, a bit
more if straight commercial text, or legal or medical texts used with
specialized dictionaries, less in other technical areas, particularly
if a variety of punctuation, special characters, or symbols are
involved; better if continuously formed fixed width fonts, worse if
proportional fonts where letters intrude on each other, much worse
with small fonts, line printer, or dot matrix output.
--
Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Brian.Inglis@CSi.com (Brian[dot]Inglis{at}SystematicSW[dot]ab[dot]ca)
fake address use address above to reply