Google Details Its Chromebook Subscriptions

Status
Not open for further replies.

irish_adam

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2010
221
6
18,685
0
I think its a great idea for students that cant afford to pay upfront for a laptop, as a uni student i def see a use for the subsciption. I have a PC for my uni work at home but for note taking and research while at uni it would be a great tool to have thats pretty cheap
 

dread_cthulhu

Distinguished
Dec 7, 2010
185
0
18,680
0
Honestly... This would probably make a great textbook replacement. Give every kid a laptop, teach em how to use it day one, and lock it down so they can't screw it up. We pay enough in taxes, and schools could use their massive textbook budgets to grab a number of these babies. Of course, I'm not an educator, so I really don't know how the actual numbers would add up, or if they'd come out cheaper this way, but still... neat idea.
 

kinggraves

Distinguished
May 14, 2010
951
0
19,010
12
See, here's my problem with Google's logic. Part of the fee involves service, support, and upgrades. Now, if I terminate the contract, I'm not getting 3 years of service, support, and upgrades, so why would I have to pay the FULL contract? Even at the maximum, the termination fee should involve the price of the machine + the service received thus far, minus what's already been paid.

Now, I'll admit that these contracts are for businesses and education, and part of the contract for businesses requires a minimum purchase of 10, so this contract is for major establishments who can likely commit to the machines for 3 years. Still, the price seems to be insane for a machine that will be outdated sooner than the first year. Google used to be the good guy, but with every step they take, they seem to be getting closer to a worse corporate entity than MS or Apple. I have a feeling that contract will draw the attention of the feds into their business practices.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I pity the people forced to use one of those pieces of crap for 3 years because their employer was cheap.

Atom cpu and an OS that is just a web browser. Those poor bastards!
 
G

Guest

Guest
What do you get with the "free software and hardware upgrades" what is are we calling hardware? is it that i get a new laptop every year then I am cool with the cost.
 
G

Guest

Guest
My company was apart of the pilot program. They were used in our sales department and I have to say everyone loved it. Sure not all of our departments could use it for everything , but considering our CRM and email are all web based it really was helpful. Now I am not happy about the price. I think that price is a little high. Not if they also included the free that most businesses pay to use google apps (50 bucks a year) then maybe. I personally own one of the originals and I can honestly say I use it more that my regular laptop.
 
G

Guest

Guest
this is by far one of the worst products to come out in recent memory, cost more and does less than even the cheapest pc's out there, it looks like Google is catering to Americas "Stupid" Demographic with this one.
 

reggieray

Distinguished
Nov 4, 2010
454
0
18,780
0
Google who is in bed with the Obozo regime can take their new laptop[ scheme and stick it. Keep all the files in the cloud so they can see your stuff when ever they want. Not that I have to hide anything, it's the principle of the matter.
 
G

Guest

Guest
The screen is too small, Atom and especially it's graphics are too weak to adequately do tasks such as Flash, video and Javascript, or 3D even if the cloud is doing the heavy lifting. For just a little more, you can get a real laptop and some el cheapo cable internet for 3 years.
 

eddieroolz

Splendid
Yeah, if I'm going to pay $1008 over 3 years for having a laptop that can do nothing but use the "cloud" then I'd rather spring for a $600 laptop with discrete graphics that can actually do something useful. The other $400 can go towards a nice camera or whatever.
 

jaksun5

Distinguished
Aug 11, 2010
95
0
18,630
0
[citation][nom]kinggraves[/nom]See, here's my problem with Google's logic. Part of the fee involves service, support, and upgrades. Now, if I terminate the contract, I'm not getting 3 years of service, support, and upgrades, so why would I have to pay the FULL contract? Even at the maximum, the termination fee should involve the price of the machine + the service received thus far, minus what's already been paid.Now, I'll admit that these contracts are for businesses and education, and part of the contract for businesses requires a minimum purchase of 10, so this contract is for major establishments who can likely commit to the machines for 3 years.[/citation]

I think in the case of businesses and education institutions the idea is to buy a 'fleet' of these for students/employees and then farm out each one to each employee/student, get the to pay the monthly fee either directly or charge it on, and then when a student/employee leaves they just give it back. UTS in Sydney, Australia already loans out notebooks, so here people will be able to have their 'own' and be covered if anything goes wrong. With 1000's of students there's always going to be someone to take it up if someone else gives one back. This model is already almost the preferred in industry, where people pay big monthly fees or $100 or more just for the notebook with added warranty. $28 in comparison is cheap, remember parts are made in China but services sometime need expensive western world labour.

Also google is probably just being a bit lazy by not giving people to many options. The last thing I'd want personally is a the scheme to get as complicated as the mobile phone industry is. Those complications are there to confuse people into not knowing what a good deal is and buying based on marketing BS. Keep in mind that we're the i1337 on this site and it's not really aimed at us necessarily, there are heaps of humanities students that don't want to know about the ins and outs.

And if you want a plain old laptop without a contract, who's stopping you? That's the system we've lived with for years. The fact of the matter is that this is the first time I can get any sort of notebook that comes with the software one might need for an up front cost of a mobile phone. Well done to Google for trying something different, and if it all tanks thanks for putting up the few million dollars to try (much better than the money going to booze and hooker like it does on Wall Street)
 

gamoniac

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2011
25
0
18,530
0
All look pretty good... but wow, a whole 100MB of data a month? Seriously, this is 2011. My Android mobile phone burnt 40MB a month doing nothing but sync'ing mail and news feed. 100MB will be used up in, optimistically, half a day. What a rip off, Google.
 

kronos_cornelius

Distinguished
Nov 4, 2009
365
1
18,780
0
The laptops are meaningless for business or education. What they care about is the service. This deal is more like a the package Novel use to do, or what Red Hat does. education and business don't want to do any IT themselfs, they want to pay $20 a month and simplify their lifes. I know because the University where I work has a few $40,000 a year employees just dedicated to making sure their Mac books and Laptops keep running. It is funny how quickly a laptop can develop its own personality.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Nothing wrong with laptop rental. What is wrong here is Google is asking a lot of money for a piece of machine and OS which is new and unproven in the field in terms of usefulness. Consider that a Windows 7 laptop can be bought for far less cost, there is minimal reason to go with such a subscription services. This venture is dead before it even takes off. If they really want to see any takeup on this thing, they should just offer a 3 years contract with maybe 1 dollar extra each month, just to appease the manufacturer Samsung and Acer. Then people might be interested and see how these things work.
 
G

Guest

Guest
LOL, If this post related to Facebook wanting to smear Google, than I think it's working wonderfully!
 

afrobacon

Distinguished
Feb 20, 2008
396
0
18,790
1
I've been playing around with the CR-48 for some time now, and I've been telling people that when these things hit the market their going to be cheap, reliable, and worth every penny. It seems I was wrong. So much for upgrading to a newer Chromebook; this whole venture is DOA now as far as I'm concerned.
 

tidex

Distinguished
Sep 27, 2010
37
0
18,530
0
My only problem is that 100 MB cap. Just watching youtube frequently would use that up in a week or less.

Outside of that it has very impressive hardware for the price. I know I know ChromeOS isn't exactly powerful and it may not interest you guys but you can just slap linux on there as soon as you get it. Its a great netbook for $240 so why the hell not?

If you're looking for a cheap, light, netbook to carry around, its the best value for the price. at least in my opinion.

otherwise just get a thinkpad or something.
 

11796pcs

Distinguished
Jan 3, 2011
608
0
18,990
4
tidex: I believe the article says that if schhols/businesses pick the 3G option they will get 100 MB per month free before they have to start paying for the bandwidth they're using.

The Chrome notebooks are still pathetic though.
 

cobra5000

Distinguished
Apr 14, 2008
504
0
19,010
6
[citation][nom]ReggieRay[/nom]Google who is in bed with the Obozo regime can take their new laptop[ scheme and stick it. Keep all the files in the cloud so they can see your stuff when ever they want. Not that I have to hide anything, it's the principle of the matter.[/citation]
Please, say one more stupid thing, I know you cant help yourself.
Not that you have anything to hide...
 

chaos133

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2010
68
0
18,630
0
Why not just get a $300 netbook instead with Windows 7 Basic? No cloud based OS, no monthly payments, and it's able to run most programs except for games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY