Hello, Ive had Q9550 for quite a while now and recently started looking at new CPUs but since I havent kept eye on the market for long time I cant really make sense of the data.
My current favourite is i5 6600k but the speed is comparable (I also got good cooling system already). The cache is in favour of the Q9550 and I dont have use for the integrated GPU since I use dedicated for gaming (got 580gtx).
The only advantage the i5 has at first glance is the 14nm but the different sites show about double the performance on tests and benchmarks.
So if someone has the time id like to explain to me why are the i5s better and suggest me other good replacements. Oh and also Im wondering if http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/ is good site to look at? If so is 6700k really effectively the best CPU and what makes it better than the 700$ cpus down the list, are they better for rendering or..?
Oh and another thing is, as I said I dont have use for integrated GPUs but I couldnt find any new CPU without one. Is this simply way for intel to make more money or are they useful and can work together with dedicated gpus?
My current favourite is i5 6600k but the speed is comparable (I also got good cooling system already). The cache is in favour of the Q9550 and I dont have use for the integrated GPU since I use dedicated for gaming (got 580gtx).
The only advantage the i5 has at first glance is the 14nm but the different sites show about double the performance on tests and benchmarks.
So if someone has the time id like to explain to me why are the i5s better and suggest me other good replacements. Oh and also Im wondering if http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/ is good site to look at? If so is 6700k really effectively the best CPU and what makes it better than the 700$ cpus down the list, are they better for rendering or..?
Oh and another thing is, as I said I dont have use for integrated GPUs but I couldnt find any new CPU without one. Is this simply way for intel to make more money or are they useful and can work together with dedicated gpus?