Hi, sorry if this is posted twice but the thread I wrote this morning seems to have vanished so think my browser screwed up. I'm looking to upgrade my graphics card, having always had NVIDIA cards was happy to stick with that and notcied on the NVIDA website a guide on building a budget pc for BF3. I'm looking for upgrading my PC for BF3 so was after a graphics card around £150: NVIDIAs recommendation was a
MSI N560GTX-M2D1GD5 GeForce GTX 560 1GB for £143
On Amazon (Only looking here for express delivery)
Asus 1GB GeForce GTX 560TI DirectCUII PCI-E Graphics Card £167
Or a
Asus nVIDIA 3D GeForce GTX 560 Direct CU II Graphics Card (1GB, DDR5, Overclocked 850Mhz) £157
Which of the three is better? I would have thought the 560GTX TI but with the 560GTX overclocked it seems a bit faster. Or would you advise against all three?
My monitor has a max 1650x1050 so I'm not after ULTRA performance at 1980 etc, just quite good graphics at 1650*1050.
Thanks
MSI N560GTX-M2D1GD5 GeForce GTX 560 1GB for £143
On Amazon (Only looking here for express delivery)
Asus 1GB GeForce GTX 560TI DirectCUII PCI-E Graphics Card £167
Or a
Asus nVIDIA 3D GeForce GTX 560 Direct CU II Graphics Card (1GB, DDR5, Overclocked 850Mhz) £157
Which of the three is better? I would have thought the 560GTX TI but with the 560GTX overclocked it seems a bit faster. Or would you advise against all three?
My monitor has a max 1650x1050 so I'm not after ULTRA performance at 1980 etc, just quite good graphics at 1650*1050.
Thanks