so im thinking about buying the new gtx 460 but i want to know if it is better then the gtx 260 1.8gb version. bettter meaning i will get better framerates at higher settings. also im running in 1920 by 1080.
games like just cause2,bad company2.crysis.metro 2033.crysis warhead.will suffer at full hd res at maxsetting.And if u go by reviews gtx460 is powerful than 5850.
Xbit normally report the max and min framerates but they have yet to publish but it will be interesting to see what the drops are, it may not drop below 30fps.if average is 44flps it doesnot means that min flps will be above 30.min flps will dip in 20 when heavy explosion or rendering takes place.For gaming keeping ur min frame above 30 is more important than keeping ur average 44 or 100
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is a recent addition to our testing suite. The game is set to maximum detail and a 30-second section is FRAPS'd whilst we run through the trenches, stumbling upon a bunch of enemy soldiers and letting rip.which part of the game was benchmarked.any mention of that.
You really ought to read about on the web a bit, if you had then you would find lots of threads, posts, and comments like this where people mention that using FRAPS to record impacts on framerates.If they benchmarked the level which has screenshot then its the first level.which is not very demanding.and benchmarking with fraps donot reduce framerate recording the game with fraps reduce framerate.And they only benchmarked 30 sec of gameplay.that will not reveal anything.And i really believe Toms benchmark but sadly even Tom donot mention which part of the game was benchmarked in games which lack built in benchmark.
When recording it will lock to whatever framerate is set but I've seen quite a few people mention that it will also have an impact on framerates when not in record mode, go google.I already told u they are discussing about recording the gameplay using fraps and converting into video .benchmarking donot reduce anything.someone else plz explain him