chrysalis :
Some reviewers have sold their souls to nvidia it seems. Unlike the 970 the 960 seems a terrible buy.
Yet one site claims the 960 is twice as fast as a 760 wtf!!!, and another is comparing it to the 660 to hide the fact its not much better than a 760 if at all.
So glad I got my 970 now, the 970 a great buy but the 960 a bad buy.
To the OP, maxwell does have memory bus optimisations of some sort, but I wouldnt get this card.
I don't think you understand. This card out performs the 760, 660, R9 280 and 270x. It goes back and forth with the 770. It's components look worse on paper but perform better in benchmarks, not to mention how little energy this card pulls and how efficiently it uses that energy. The 960 isn't a "bad buy" per say, it's a $200 card that will let you play all of the games at decent settings and is going to support future titles.
Keep in mind this card's predecessor is the 750ti and performs very well for what it is purposed to be. Does it do as well or offer the most performance per dollar in comparison to a few older cards, the 970 and 980? No, but that is like being upset your 750ti didn't perform as well as your 660, 760, or 770.
Also Nvidia outright said overclock this card!!! I think it is clear that Intel has been able to re-purpose it's haswell cores to do damn good work on graphics cards. Sure the 970 and 980 blow this thing away but those are $330 and $430 cards. Just saying.