Thats the million dollar question.
I know that there is hardly (if at all) any good benchmark that has both the 690 and 680 4GB in it.
Or atleast not in the way i mean.
In terms of vram the gtx680 4GB wins. No argument as it simply has more active vram.
Atm you will hardly notic and the gtx690 will be the better choice.
But.....
Is it futureproof?
In a year or so maybe a little more 2GB vram will probably take a nosedive vs the 4GB of the 680. But as for the speed and other factors i don't know.
It may have less vram but it seems to me that the 690 is faster than the 680.
So the question.
In the long run what would be better. Two gtx690 sli or 2-3way sli gtx680 4GB?
And i mean like speed, cooling you name it. Cause the vram is obvious.
I know that there is hardly (if at all) any good benchmark that has both the 690 and 680 4GB in it.
Or atleast not in the way i mean.
In terms of vram the gtx680 4GB wins. No argument as it simply has more active vram.
Atm you will hardly notic and the gtx690 will be the better choice.
But.....
Is it futureproof?
In a year or so maybe a little more 2GB vram will probably take a nosedive vs the 4GB of the 680. But as for the speed and other factors i don't know.
It may have less vram but it seems to me that the 690 is faster than the 680.
So the question.
In the long run what would be better. Two gtx690 sli or 2-3way sli gtx680 4GB?
And i mean like speed, cooling you name it. Cause the vram is obvious.