Haswell, Broadwell or Skylake ?

technoguru

Reputable
Aug 22, 2014
38
0
4,530
My current CPU is pentium G3258 paired up with Z97 mobo.
I wanted to buy Broadwell i5 or i7 but I saw somewhere that they wont be very good on PC so I was thinking about getting i5 4690k or i7 4790k. I also saw that Skylake is just around the corner so should I upgrade my mobo and get i5 or i7 skylake ?
 
Broadwell will probably be a more efficient cpu than haswell but since you already have a z97 motherboard it would make more sense to get either an i5 4690k or 4790k. Projected release of skylake has been pushed back even though intel said it planned to release it almost on top of broadwell's release. For the slight improvement of skylake I don't think it's worth ditching your z97 motherboard and buying another one all over again. I'm assuming that was the point of the z97 motherboard when you paired it with the 3258, so you'd be set up to just drop a haswell or devil's canyon i5/i7 into it.
 
Yes I do, perhaps I should have added that to the list of cpu's. Although broadwell is again like I stated originally a die shrink and therefor an efficiency boost, not a performance boost and has yet to come out with an official release date for desktop. If it's not worth waiting for skylake, what makes it worth waiting for broadwell? Broadwell's been a thorn in intel's side from the getgo and they originally wanted to leave it as a mobile platform. It got pushed back so far due to problems with the die shrink that it piled it right at the same time they intended to release skylake and now despite saying they wouldn't push skylake back, it looks like that's exactly what's happening from latest speculations.

So if the op has a z97 motherboard and they're looking to upgrade - they mentioned waiting for skylake which would be slightly improved (20% performance if you trust speculation to date) AND require a new motherboard. They've already invested in a z97 and are looking to upgrade from their g3258. What logical reason would there be waiting for broadwell at this point? But yes, broadwell is an option on z97.
 
MisterSprinkles, do you have anything better to do than rip into my answers? Do yourself a favor, I read the post. I know the op has a z97 board. I don't care if it has more transistors or not, you apparently aren't familiar with intel's tick tock cycle or you'd know better before trying to act like a know it all. The performance boost people are waiting for is in skylake, NOT broadwell. If you spent half the time informing yourself as you do trying to point out my flaws you might just learn something - DUDE.
 
Some info from extremetech. "Ever since Intel announced it would launch Broadwell (a “tick” or die shrink) and Skylake (a “tock” or new architecture)". "The primary columns of interest to most enthusiasts are the changes between the Z97 and Z170. The Z170 will retain the same PCIe 3.0 configuration options for graphics, but makes several changes to connectivity and flexibility. The total number of USB 3.0 ports has been boosted to 10, up from 6, while secondary USB 3.0 connectivity for peripherals is vastly improved, to 20 PCIe 3.0 lanes."

http://www.extremetech.com/computing/198783-fresh-details-leak-on-intel-skylake-chipsets-processors

From tech radar. "Skylake, the code-name for the 6th Gen Core CPUs, is a new microarchitecture, using the current 14nm production process. 'You should expect a significant increase in performance, in battery life, in power efficiency,' says Skaugen. Broadwell though is only likely to offer a relatively small performance boost over the current Haswell chips. It is essentially the same architecture as Haswell, only shrunk down to the 14nm level from the existing 22nm process."

http://www.techradar.com/us/news/computing-components/processors/will-intel-s-skylake-cpus-render-desktop-broadwell-processors-irrelevant--1265595

From vrworld. "The LGA1150 Broadwell offerings are essentially a 14nm shrink of the Haswell die, and unlike previous years, Intel will not be offering a full gamut of CPUs across pricing tiers. Instead, the vendor will focus its efforts on the Skylake architecture, the tock in Intel’s tick-tock release cadence cycle. Skylake will also be fabricated on a 14nm process, but will usher in significant CPU and GPU improvements along with lesser power consumption."

http://www.vrworld.com/2015/03/25/intel-to-launch-two-broadwell-cpus-for-desktop-skylake-debuting-in-october/

All of this reiterates what I already said. Which is why intel likely initially didn't want to put broadwell to desktop, it was initially for the mobile sector where energy efficiency plays a key role. Some larger corporations may see the efficiency factor but for the typical home user given average use of a pc, shaving a few watts off the cpu isn't going to make a huge difference in terms of cost on the electric bill. Especially since current cpu's already have speed step and drop down in power when idle or under low use. Skylake on the other hand is an entirely new architecture. Even though devil's canyon was just released and commonly referred to as 'haswell refresh' is because it's still haswell. It's not a new architecture and neither is broadwell (which is why broadwell fits the lga1150). Hopefully broadwell will be out sometime 2nd quarter but it hasn't been officially announced yet. Neither has skylake and it's already been pushed back a good quarter despite intel originally saying they wouldn't. Now we know how much words mean, anything can change. Skylake 'probably' won't get pushed to 4th quarter 2015 or 1st quarter 2016 but then again it wasn't 'supposed' to get pushed back at all according to intel's previous comments.

Another thing to consider in all of this, a new chip is always a roll of the dice. Case in point, prescott chips and the deep execution prediction pipelines that hurt performance and had all sorts of heat issues. On amd's side, what about bulldozer, the huge game changer that was supposed to be and wasn't? There are two ways to look at it, a roll of the dice and hope that specs on paper and theories pan out with the new tech that hasn't landed yet and can't be verified, or the current tech that has solid real world performance to equate to. I wasn't saddened by devil's canyon performance but then it was a real item and I knew what to expect. Those early adopters who couldn't wait to snatch it up and toss it in their machine were a tad disappointed since intel's initial claims were that it would 'hit 5ghz on air cooling' referring to the 4690k. Not so much, some chips have hit 5ghz under extreme cooling - but not easy as pie on air like they claimed and intel's pr had to quickly backtrack after making those hopeful claims.
 
Well then consider yourself corrected. I make it a point to check facts before distributing advice, perhaps you should take your own advice. My feelings aren't hurt one bit, you however are the one dispelling incorrect information. I made sure to include plenty of reading material to back up exactly what I said to begin with. I don't expect anyone to take my word on it's own merit and I'm more than willing to help educate others.
 
There is no argument. The information I gave was on point. You came along and nitpicked at everything I said trying to say I was giving ridiculous information. Funny though, my information was spot on along with the three source I cited not counting many others I felt were redundant. If you're going to make claims about the information I provide being 'ridiculous' or 'outright incorrect' you need sources to back that up. I'm not sure if you're just trolling or what the deal is, why you think you've got any point of contention to call me out on what I said in the beginning. If you've got sources otherwise I'll be happy to take a look at them.

In summary, the op has 3 choices. Buy the top of the line chips physically on the market now for the current motherboard which is the 4690k/4790k. They can wait another however many months for broadwell for 'maybe' 5% performance increase and irrelevant efficiency for a desktop rig and continue with the performance (I'm assuming the op is unhappy with or they wouldn't be looking to upgrade) in the meantime. Or they can wait even longer for potentially worthwhile performance increase at the expense of additional time and the cost of a new motherboard (and possibly ram if they decide to go ddr4 on the 1151).
 
Yea, that's what I thought. High school drama and no real sources to back your claims. Troll elsewhere if you're not going to be a productive part of the process sprinkles. I offered you the chance and now we see how you chose to respond, like a child. No facts whatsoever.
 
I have to agree here with synphul
And well since you already do have z97 platform it might not be worth it at all to wait for broadwell since it won't be that much faster as for skylake I myself is waiting for it but I am on 2nd gen 2600k so it's about time for an upgrade for me
You can wait for broadwell if you want but you won't get that much of a boost but in the end it is of course up to you but since you already got the z97 Mobo I don't think you should aim for Skylake since there is no way to know how much it will improve until it's release I might be disappointed by it and wait for something better myself since Intel didn't offer any real improvement from a gen to the next in a long while
 
Given that he wants to keep his z97 motherboard, waiting a month or two for a 5-7% cpu boast sounds reasonable to me. Synphul, on the other hand, sounds a bit "touched".
 
I'm not touched at all Mikeydred. Just helping the op weigh out their options, broadwell isn't a performance bump. Many sources have already discussed this to death, it's an efficiency improvement and scaling down from 22nm to 14nm die size. The performance bump will be skylake and that isn't z97 compatible. Sprinkles is too busy posting kiddy sarcasm to join the discussion and funny enough is failing to prove me wrong or bring some sort of witty put down. Double fail. It didn't get a pity chuckle the first time they posted it so apparently posting it again bigger makes it funnier. Moronic childish logic at it's finest *thumbs up*
 
First you try to refute my responses based on fact and backed with links - neither of which you've provided. Then you follow up with two posts, redundant and irrelevant to the discussion for the purpose of trying to mock me, this is your 3rd irrelevant post directly to me and totally off topic. I've provided info to the op, this is just turning into the sad kiddy hour with you mistersprinkles. Your trolling is pure failure, that's not smack talk - it's a fact.