Short answer:
If the OP is desperate, and is willing to try anything, even at the risk of losing his data, then he could try forcibly updating his drive using the 1AA17AQM.D38 firmware image.
Long answer:
I've been trying to make sense of what went wrong, so I've used a hex editor to examine the update's EXE file.
Here is a direct link:
http://ftp.dell.com/sata/R220314.exe
This is Dell's support page:
http://support.dell.com/support/downloads/download.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&releaseid=R220314&fileid=313702
The details for the update are ...
Release Date: 5/12/2009
Version: 1AC00017, A00
This firmware prevents a potential "hang" condition with the following Dell hard drives.
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB - DP/N XT518 (I = 3 heads)
Samsung HD103UJ 1TB - DP/N FY878 (U = 6 heads)
The first thing I noticed is that the HD753LJ (L = 6 heads) and HD103UJ models have the same number of heads.
The following Dell page lists the specifications for the SpinPoint F1 models that Dell supplies:
Specifications: SAMSUNG SpinPoint F1 Series Hard-Disk Drive User's Guide:
http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/storage/p158782/specs.htm
Description HD251HJ HD322HJ HD502IJ HD103UJ
---------------------------------------------------------------
Number of disks 1 1 2 3
Number of read/write heads 2 2 4* 6
It would appear that the HD251HJ, HD502IJ, and HD753LJ models have data densities of 250GB per platter, whereas the HD322HJ and HD103UJ appear to have 333GB per platter. This appears to account for the difference between the HD753LJ and HD103UJ, ie same number of heads, but different data density.
(* I suspect that the HD502IJ actually has 3 heads, which would give it a data density of 333GB/platter --- I = 3 heads)
FYI, I have done some investigation into Samsung's model nomenclature here:
http://forum.hddguru.com/samsung-model-numbers-t19214.html
To get an idea of how Samsung's updates work, I examined earlier Dell updates for other Samsung models, eg ...
http://ftp.dell.com/ide/R139989.EXE
The update package includes the following:
1107.EST - an encoded script file
tk09m.DN2 - the firmware image
sflash24.exe - the flash utility
UPDATE.BAT - contains the line "sflash24 /run:1107.est /auto"
Samsung's later updates appear to pack all the above files into a single EXE.
After poking about with a hex editor, I believe that the first part of the F1_FW_17.EXE file is the SFLASH executable.
Further on, we find a "header" section:
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/MFLASH_H.bin
This header lists the starting offset and size of 4 embedded firmware images. I have extracted them here:
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/1AA17AQM.D11
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/1AA17AQM.D17
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/1AA17AQM.D28
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/1AA17AQM.D38
I believe that the tail end of the EXE file has an encoded script file:
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/F1_FW_17.EST
Here is the embedded documentation for Samsung's SFLASH firmware update utility:
http://www.users.on.net/~fzabkar/HDD/F1_FW_17/SFLASH_Usage.txt
I believe the script file contains instructions for matching the various firmware images against the detected model numbers. Seagate also does it this way. I have managed to decipher Seagate's scripts, but I haven't been able to do the same for Samsung.
Comparing the firmware image files against Dell's table of model numbers, ISTM that the first numeric character in the Dnn file extensions indicates the number of platters for the drive to which it applies. So this would suggest that both the HD753LJ and HD103UJ models would receive the same 1AA17AQM.D38 update.
ISTM, that if the OP is desperate, and is willing to try anything, even at the risk of losing his data, then he could try forcibly updating his drive using the 1AA17AQM.D38 firmware image.