HDD and SSD below expectation?

[petitloup932]

I did a benchmark on user-benchmark and both my HDD and SSD are below expectation. Any idea why? just to mention I have already defrag.

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/9136118

 

[RARRAF]

the SSD is an old model but performing reasonable and the hard drive is doing 70mbs seams good.

 

[Rdslw]

Defragged data pushed your HDD to top 88% in this HDD model. about slower drive, its probably almost full, right ? a lot of things cause this, windows tryin to be smart and preloading data, steam updates, games, background etc...

 

[petitloup932]

Defragged data pushed your HDD to top 88% in this HDD model. about slower drive, its probably almost full, right ? a lot of things cause this, windows tryin to be smart and preloading data, steam updates, games, background etc...

https://gyazo.com/e34a07961beed7f71a10865e4fc3b778

well it says I have 311 Go spare place.
may it be because one of the partition is full?
https://gyazo.com/9cd2efc79c897b1ca06a147d9832fcbc
do you know how can I give Go from a partition to another partition?

 

[USAFRet]

I did a benchmark on user-benchmark and both my HDD and SSD are below expectation. Any idea why? just to mention I have already defrag.

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/9136118

The only thing that is "below expectation" is the tool you are using...userbenchmark.com.
Look to the right..."69.5% Good"

 

[4745454b]

Not sure about your blue drive. Spinning disks are only for storage which doesn't need speed. If it's an older drive that you filled up, that might be your problem. Or, because it's from 2010, it might just be performing like an 8yo drive.

As for your SSD, I think that might be behaving correctly.

https://www.cnet.com/products/samsung-840-evo/review/

Sequential read: Up to 540MBps
Sequential write: Up to 520MBps (250GB/500GB/750GB/1TB), and up to 410MBps (120GB)

First, you never get the "up to" speed. Don't even be mad if it doesn't get there. They say "up to" for a reason. Your only a bit behind the read speed, and by a similar margin the write speed. You got 328MBps which is a bit slower than the up to 410MBps. But check out Anands review.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/7173/samsung-ssd-840-evo-review-120gb-250gb-500gb-750gb-1tb-models-tested/8

If you scroll down to the incompressible sequential read/write for the 120GB 840evo, you'll see you get scores of 504/401. You should compare to these numbers, not the 540/410. If you should get 504/401 and you get 475/328, you really aren't that far off.

Do the normal things. Update firmware, make sure there is free space on the drive, etc. You have an older smaller evo drive paired with an older slower CPU. It's a bit slower than what others got, but it's not horribly slow(er).

 

[geofelt]

As I recall, The sata controllers on AMD motherboards are not as good as the intel sata controllers.
That likely explains some differences.