my goal is 1440p/100+fps on AAA games. no streaming or workplace stuff.
my GPU will be either a 1080 TI or rtx 2080 (waiting the 2080 ships for accurate benchmarks)
i'm considering the r5 2600 or 2700 (maybe x?), because the i7 CPU's cost more, require a semi-expensive cooler and motherboard, and on the benchmarks i've checked the difference between the r5 and i7 CPU's are about 1-15 fps, and with the fps difference they both were above 100 fps anyways. with g-sync would i likely notice a 15 fps difference if it's above 100 fps still? is like $50-100 dollars more worth 15 more fps? i'm thinking probably not, but i guess it would be if it's a noticeable difference. i just can't test that because i'm on a 1080p tv with 60 hz refresh rate, and i assume the difference between 115 and 130 fps with g-sync is less than the difference between 60 and 45 fps without g-sync.
here are the components i am considering, but haven't bought yet:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/h8GJBb
any insight would be appreciated
my GPU will be either a 1080 TI or rtx 2080 (waiting the 2080 ships for accurate benchmarks)
i'm considering the r5 2600 or 2700 (maybe x?), because the i7 CPU's cost more, require a semi-expensive cooler and motherboard, and on the benchmarks i've checked the difference between the r5 and i7 CPU's are about 1-15 fps, and with the fps difference they both were above 100 fps anyways. with g-sync would i likely notice a 15 fps difference if it's above 100 fps still? is like $50-100 dollars more worth 15 more fps? i'm thinking probably not, but i guess it would be if it's a noticeable difference. i just can't test that because i'm on a 1080p tv with 60 hz refresh rate, and i assume the difference between 115 and 130 fps with g-sync is less than the difference between 60 and 45 fps without g-sync.
here are the components i am considering, but haven't bought yet:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/h8GJBb
any insight would be appreciated