Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.dcameras (
More info?)
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:02:52 GMT, "Pete" <Pete@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"imbsysop" <imbsysop@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:aulfb1da1h8qkbd9e34rm689jn47k45n94@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:49:31 GMT, "Pete" <Pete@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"imbsysop" <imbsysop@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:at4db1la2ggb4pfn7rv1krk1r5tr4prfbc@4ax.com...
>> >> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:10:11 GMT, <Pete@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
>> >> >Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
>> >> >It seems to have great power in its simplicity of operation.
>> >>
>> >> www.hp945.com ??
>> >>
>> >Thanks! (I had never heard of this group.)
>> >
>>
>> no problem .. I've been in the running for an HP945 for a while 'cos I
>> have a c912 that I like very much and my freind had a 945 so ..
>> finally decided for a Canon G6 ..
>>
>Funny. Consumer reports lists 60 shots as the maximum for the 945 on a set
>of batteries. I got 130, and many of them were with flash and movies! I use
>NiMH rechargables.
That would surprise me very much .. maybe they speak about alkalines ?
With my HP912 I could easily get between 150-200 shots on one NiMH
charge and the 912 was known to be extremely power "hungry" .. but
then I never had to use the LCD because of the outstanding TTL
viewfinder .. wish they made P&S cams with this type of viewfinder
these days instead of that stupid little piece of optical "magnifying
glass"
🙂
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram