Hey SONY, Still think making that movie was a good idea?

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I saw the previews of the movie "The Interview", I knew it was a mistake, I don't know what movie makers think in their brains is acceptable behavior today, but I feel quite sure from all that's happened that at least SONY should now realize they crossed the line! :lol:

I'm not condoning the hacking that's got SONY in hot water today, and will cost them millions!, but come on?, did SONY really think that movie should have ever have been made in the first place and publicly advertised?

Obviously there are lines you don't cross! :)
 
It's a MOVIE. The movie will still come out, and people will still see it(maybe more now with all the publicity). Then it will be released on DVD, and will sell a bunch - again being helped by the publicity. I'm not convinced that they'll lose money on this movie, and that's what its all about anyway.
 
what is horribly sad is that ss is right

now even more mindless sheep will go see it

maybe there was never even any hacking
 


Excellent Point!

Sometimes it amazes me of the lack of compassion and the thirst for blood the media even portrays.

Example: What really sickens me is when for instant there is a car crash or something like that a young adult driver is killed, and the parents are the ones that discover the crash and call in the 911 call. Fire and rescue shows up the parents are in total shock and horror slapped in the face with the reality they just lost their child.
Then some news media person walks up sticks a microphone in their faces and asks them how they felt when they discovered it was their child?

What!?

Why the hell would you ask them something like that?

The answer is unfortunate!

 


The reason I keep deleting your posts is because they're in violation of the no-GRAPES rule. I'd be more inclined to let them slide if they didn't look like they belonged on a conspiracy theorists blog and didn't look like they were written by a third grader.
 
not that I'm mad or looking to be banned but he asked the question and I gave my answer to it in truth and honest and a point of view and if that's pulled then this whole thread should go right with it ... what kind of answer do you expect form this ???

so lets be fair .. ok?
 


Keep the political jabs and commentary out of it and construct your posts using proper spelling, grammar, and sentence structure.

I didn't delete your posts because of your opinions, I don't care about those. What I do care about is the quality of the discourse in this forum.

not okay:
seems the us of a is looking like a joke on that deal and seems they really cant protect anyone or anything .. so whats our tax dollars paying for to the programs that insures this freedom we use to have ?? all administration and little to no action it seems

okay:
I'm worried about the long term ramifications of these events. The internet has historically been a self-policing entity with little government involvement outside of basic telecommunication administration. Now that we've entered an age in which cyber terrorism is starting to be a successful tactic it will only be a matter of time until nation states start to take a greater interest in it from a national security perspective

The former is barely understandable and mixes hyperbole with pointless commentary. These kinds of posts may be allowed on Reddit's politics section and the comments of Fox News articles, but they are not allowed here.

The later states a clear objective opinion. It still skirts the no-GRAPES policy a bit but that's a soft rule so I'd allow it as long as it's civil.
 


It's fine Ryan. The Sony security breach is worth discussing as it's incredibly relevant with respect to security best practices, corporate responsibility, and consumer confidence. I'm going to leave this open for now.
 
Maybe because I'm older but it just amazes me today of some of the movies coming out of Hollywood these days, they just don't seem to have the writing behind them that even requires a good actor anymore, all the special effects and extreme CGI possible today that they can do pretty much anything today to make imagination look realistic.

Take James Cameron's movie Avatar for an example of IMO a really good CGI movie, all the creatures in the movie looked real, so there's so much fascinating stuff that can be done today to bring the imagination to life.

Obama made a statement yesterday that he thought Sony made a mistake to pull the movie and I agree, but unfortunately sometimes the criminals do win, but my point is, I personally don't think the movie should have been made in the first place, it surely wasn't an offering of good will towards North Korea.

If a movie is totally irresponsible enough for this type of feedback to occur before it is even released causing Sony to loose millions how is going to affect other movie producers in their advance forward with possible movie ideas and concepts, and are we on the verge of movie censorship because of it?

Censorship is everywhere even here in the forums, we cannot talk about some things and that's a fact, and out in the world we all seem to need to be as they say politically correct, God forbid you say the wrong thing out in the real world or the media will crucify you.

The media doesn't seem to have a problem ruining peoples lives especially the well know, it's almost like guilty before a trial is even held with the negativity plastered everywhere.

I guess I'd best shut up now before I cross a line myself.
 
Maybe because I'm older but it just amazes me today of some of the movies coming out of Hollywood these days, they just don't seem to have the writing behind them that even requires a good actor anymore, all the special effects and extreme CGI possible today that they can do pretty much anything today to make imagination look realistic.

Take James Cameron's movie Avatar for an example of IMO a really good CGI movie, all the creatures in the movie looked real, so there's so much fascinating stuff that can be done today to bring the imagination to life.

I hear ya. Most of my favourite movies are from the 60s, 70s, and 80s. There are a lot of good modern action flicks with tons of CGI but it's painfully obvious when the actors are simply standing in front of a coloured screen trying to play it out. Worse are ones that digitally alter the actors because this is sometimes painfully obvious. Captain America: The First Avenger is a good example of this, they digitally shrunk the main actor in many of the early scenes and those scenes looked quite awkward as a result. There was a time when actors had to act to be successful, now it's all about looking pretty and having readily available stunt doubles. Some of the more oldschool directors such as Steven Spielberg still know how to cook up an awesome movie though.

I just rewatched Escape from Alcatraz (1979) this morning and it still blows many modern films out of the water.

Obama made a statement yesterday that he thought Sony made a mistake to pull the movie and I agree, but unfortunately sometimes the criminals do win, but my point is, I personally don't think the movie should have been made in the first place, it surely wasn't an offering of good will towards North Korea.

If a movie is totally irresponsible enough for this type of feedback to occur before it is even released causing Sony to loose millions how is going to affect other movie producers in their advance forward with possible movie ideas and concepts, and are we on the verge of movie censorship because of it?

From what I've heard they haven't pulled the movie completely, they just cancelled the Christmas release because the major studio partners bitched out. If they had released it with only a few theaters carrying it it would have flopped financially as soon as cams hit the torrent sites. Cancelling the release made sense financially until they can find an alternative mechanism of release or wait until everything blows over. It's not done, just delayed.

Censorship is everywhere even here in the forums, we cannot talk about some things and that's a fact, and out in the world we all seem to need to be as they say politically correct, God forbid you say the wrong thing out in the real world or the media will crucify you.

There's a certain degree of truth to this. I don't like to call it censorship though because that implies that we're moderating post material based on the subject or content of the post rather than the post's mechanism and tone of delivery. The no-GRAPES policy was put in place to deal with certain repeat offenders that would throw a hand grenade into a thread and run for cover before it went off. It's not designed to squash discourse, but rather to prevent rhetoric and destructive arguments.

I can't speak for everyone but I consider it a necessary evil, it's something that I'd much rather not have but it's unfortunately needed (at least for now) to keep some users from grabbing at each other's throats.

It's a much easier policy to work around than it seems at first and as I mentioned above it's a soft rule that leaves mods with lots of discretion. A good litmus test is to write a post as if it were being discussed around a water cooler or dinner table rather than on an anonymous forum.

The media doesn't seem to have a problem ruining peoples lives especially the well know, it's almost like guilty before a trial is even held with the negativity plastered everywhere.

I guess I'd best shut up now before I cross a line myself.

The media drives me nuts as well. My brother's fiancée finished a journalism degree but ended up changing her career due to her disgust with the industry. When I do read news I limit myself to major news wires such as BBC, ABC, AP, AFP, and Reuters.
 
well that's the point of this thread right? he asked if it was a good idea... well yes it a good idea, but when something caused a threat to it, the folks involved at sony feel there civil rights or personal freedom as given to them under our laws apparently cant be enforced , upheld, or guarded to the point they needed to take the measures they did on that ..


''Keep the political jabs and commentary out ''-- what else is it ??? they [sony] don't feel our gov. is able to protect there well being and had to take them measures

dang man how else can you see that??

These kinds of posts may be allowed on Reddit's politics section and the comments of Fox News articles, but they are not allowed here.

and this is why I said '' then you need to pull the whole thread'' and this thread has nothing to do with tech or hardware . its the type of question that you will hear at fox news ,meet the press . ect..

 
@ junkeymonkey, This is the News & Leisure section, that is the Title of the Section, it does not say Technology News & Leisure.

That's why some conversations go on in News & Leisure that do not cover technology, if technology is all you're after why don't you stay up top helping others, with your 452 best answers you've obviously helped many users here.

But in News & Leisure with all due respect, you kinda come across as a problem, ignoring warnings, do you ever read the things you post before you click the submit button?

You do realize every time you click the Submit Button, you're doing it in agreement with Toms Rules of Conduct, Right?

If you keep thumbing your nose at the moderators warnings you will loose, and the consequences will only be your fault.
 
''You do realize everytime you click the Submit Button, you're doing it in agreement with Toms Rules of Conduct, Right?''

I guess its all in how its interpreted one lawyer says BLACK the next one says black all things can be twisted to ones advantage ..

hay man, all I see is you asked why and I answered why . sorry you can accept that . I'm sure views in other contrary's are not as in the U.S we got laws and a constitution that is to protect sony and all involved and grant them the freedom to do a movie under freedom of expression and speech ..

seeing you cant understand this kinda tells me you may not be a American and don't have a understanding of our bill of rights and constitution

seems like the only answers you want to hear is ''ya, that sony is a do do head for doing that ???

''you kinda come across as a problem child,'' yes I am so what ?? and don't this fall under the rule of a personal attack on a member ???
well I said what I had to and i'll leave it at that .. so try to have a nice day
 
Status
Not open for further replies.