Hi, i would like someone to help me build a budget PC

phenom01

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2010
37
0
18,530
My budget is $350 after mail in rebate. I want to use it for internet, watching movies, music, MS office, visual studios and playing starcraft:broodwar and counter-strike 1.6. I already have windows xp, mouse, keyboard and a monitor.
 

phenom01

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2010
37
0
18,530
Approximate Purchase Date: ASAP


Budget Range: $350 After Rebaetes


System Usage from Most to Least Important:internet, word processing, visual studios and starcraft:broodware and counter-strike: 1.6


Parts Not Required: keyboard, mouse, windows xp, monitor


Preferred Website(s) for Parts: ANY


Country of Origin: USA


Parts Preferences: NO Preference


Overclocking: NO


SLI or Crossfire: NO


Monitor Resolution: 1440x900



 
$353AR
Untitled-1286.jpg
 
Negative for budget mobos one have to be careful with chipset/s picked out

For any Nvidia based chipset before

GF8100
GF8200
750a
980a

all before would have HT limitation when used with an AM2+/AM3 chip and still on PCIe gen 1.0/1.1 lanes. True AM2+ would have no HT Limitation and moved over to PCIe gen 2.0 as of 2008

GA-M68MT-D3 (and any other NForce 630a chipset for that matter)
http://www.gigabyte.us/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3497#ov
* If you install AMD AM3 CPU on this motherboard, the system bus speed will downgrade from HT3.0 (5200MT/s) to HT1.0 (2000 MT/s) spec; however, the frequency of AM3 CPU will not be impacted. Please refer "CPU Support List" for more information.
 

calguyhunk

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2010
1,456
0
19,460
Hi phenom01, 400 watt is barely enough for a GTS 450 especially if you wanna play 'round with stock settings. I'll definitely look for around 40 amps on the +12V Rail as you have to factor in capacitor aging at least, if not any future upgrades.

One thing I missed in my last post (& sorry for that) is that you're not a serious gamer. Your primary requirement is net surfing/multimedia/home entertainment. If you're only a casual gamer, you should actually save some money by getting a EVGA GeForce GT 430 (Fermi) 1GB or a XFX Radeon HD 4670 1GB if your main requirement is net surfing/multimedia/home entertainment.

There's absolutely no need to get such an expensive graphics card, IMO.
 

Yargnit

Distinguished
Aug 17, 2010
261
0
18,810
I'd still stick with the GTS450 over the GT430, as he's playing SC, I would want to make sure he can play SC2 decently without having to upgrade, and the GTS450 is a much safer bet for that for not that much more.
 

calguyhunk

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2010
1,456
0
19,460
Forget 'bout SC, even CS, WOW are some of the most gfx un-intensive amongst the popular games.

A casual gamer at 1440 X 900 doesn't really need a GTS 450 over a GT430 in what will mainly be a word processing PC for the occasional dabble in light gaming.

Maybe for Crysis, Metro...but SC? While a GT430 might not let you play on ultra, it should be more than alright for the occasional bout of gaming, IMO.

But seeing as the prices aren't really that different, might as well get the 450.
 
Yes but u have to run down to like 1024 x 768 medium or at most prolly 1280 x 1024? +1 stay away via 10 foot pole from GT430: between it and HD 4250 IGP i'd rather save $$ and chug along on IGP rather than blow on an awful $$/frame card like GT430 @@ Here we see it being spanked by dated cards like HD 4670/9600GT

dow2_1280_1024-1.gif

dirt2_1280_1024.gif

bfbc2_1280_1024.gif