G
Guest
Guest
Just out of curiousity, I wonder how Dr. Toms underclock his P4 1.4 Ghz down to P4 1.0 Ghz. Even if he manage to change the FSB to such a slow FSB, the benchmark of clock to clock basics would not be representative of the actual P4 because the bus has been made slower, the RAM run slower, the AGP run slower, the PCI run slower. Would the benchmark that he ran be representative still? Somemore, could he find the bus speed of 71.419 Mhz (Quad Pump) on the new motherboard to run his P4 at 1.0 Ghz?
And he said
"Yes, I thought I should really do this, although Intel certainly despises me for it. I underclocked one of their great Pentium 4 processors to 1 GHz and compared it with Pentium III 1 GHz."
"Although Intel certainly despises me for it" said Toms -- Another hint?
Would this suggest that he altered the multiplier to 10X?
Well, if what he has got is an engineering samples that wasn't multiplier lock then I rest my case.
And he said
"Yes, I thought I should really do this, although Intel certainly despises me for it. I underclocked one of their great Pentium 4 processors to 1 GHz and compared it with Pentium III 1 GHz."
"Although Intel certainly despises me for it" said Toms -- Another hint?
Would this suggest that he altered the multiplier to 10X?
Well, if what he has got is an engineering samples that wasn't multiplier lock then I rest my case.