d0x360 :
People also forget amds architecture allows them to do more per clock cycle than nvidia.
That's nvidias mistake and they are making it again here. They keep chasing higher clocks to brute Force rendering. It's managed to beat amd because their architecture wasn't up to the task but that has changed
... Their architecture is like Intel and amd has once again found a way to be the best. They just need a few more months to refine what is already an excellent design for both the CPU and GPU market.
Brute Force only gets you so far. Finesse is not in their playbook at all but it's the basis for everything and is setting up.
I can't effectively disagree with you, because I simply lack the raw data. But this makes me all the more curious exactly
what you're basing this on, and
where you got such information.
BTW, I don't know if you saw that they doubled the number of warp schedulers, improved the granularity of thread scheduling, improved L1 cache bandwidth, and claim >= 50% more efficient SM's than GP100. And yet, I saw no mention of clock speeds (Wikipedia claims it's clocked at 1.37 GHz, which is just 5% faster than the GP100). This doesn't exactly line up with what you're saying about brute forcing clock speeds...