how did they took those numbers?

[matsamas]

hello folks.
Just came up with another issue.

How did they took the fps on several benchmarks on battlefield 4 regarding 4k displays?
like on ultra 2xr9 290x in cfx does 45fps and so on.

The reason i ask is while currently gaming battlefield 4 ONLINE on asus pb287q 4k monitor,on HIGH SETTINGS,V-sync off using
perfoverlay.drawfps true
command on console i had arround 100-129(max i saw)fps
pretty awesome fps.
i use 2xr9 290 tri-x oc gpus in cfx.
on v-sync on i have 60fos but sometimes it goes down to 50 and i have some lag so it turn it off and the lowest i get is 90fps.

My issue is that if i change on ultra i get game crash,driver error reffering to low graphic card memory.

So on beanchmark they only get fps on offline mode? why they dont get driver crush?

i measured my psu wattage draw and it was 628 watt on 860watt corsair axi series psu.

i found my issue normal and on high i am 100% satisfied with amazing breathtaking graphics and details.

just wondering why i crush instead of just getting low fps.

 

[RobCrezz]

Can you link to the benchmark you are talking about?

They might have been running AA and higher detail options than you.

 

[matsamas]

i will provide screens with my fps and stuff in an hour when i will be back home.