That PSU needs to be changed. Will you be overclocking, ever? If so, an H97 board would save you money and give you basically the same features.
That SSD is now technically out dated aswell so getting the newer version or a different 120GB SSD all together will save you money and add performance. As for storage, how reliable does the HDD need to be? Is the end product crucial data? If so, looking into RAID 1 might be a good idea. Or just getting a WD Green.
-Switched MOBO to Asus H97-PLUS ATX LGA1150 Motherboard
-Switched Primary HDD to Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive. (Secondary drive I think is fine and I am within budget.)
-Switched cases to Xigmatek Recon ATX Mid Tower Case (Stupid USB 3.0 Headers.)
I didn't see the dual 4K monitors in the parts list?
What?
Once your tried dual monitors, there is no going back
Dual 4k monitors are ridiculously expensive and his PC won't be able to handle it. No PC could handle it except maybe tri or quad SLI Titan X (in a PC that'd cost $5000-6000 in America, more elsewhere).
Dual 4k monitors are ridiculously expensive and his PC won't be able to handle it. No PC could handle it except maybe tri or quad SLI Titan X (in a PC that'd cost $5000-6000 in America, more elsewhere).
My point was that,
A) He is building a system for 3D modelling, but seemingly failed to consider the monitor.
B) Most (or at least many) professional modellers would be running large dual or Tri screens.
Frame rates aren't as critical in modelling compared to gaming. You can live with 20 frames a second in exchange for more desktop space. You don't need a quad GPU setup to run a couple of large monitors.
He never mentioned monitors. He probably already has dual monitors. I know you don't need quad SLI to run dual monitor, one is enough, but for 4k you'd need at least 2 or 3 high end GPUs for gaming and stuff.