How future proof is a system built around...?

Frizzo

Distinguished
Sep 17, 2010
599
0
19,010
2500k + 6870

(for games, online games mostly)

what is coming out in the near future that will significantly best these processors in tandem? (again mostly for online games).
 
Depends on your screen resolution. The CPU should be fine for several years, but the GPU may struggle at higher resolutions.

That said, MMOs tend to not be too demanding... the exception was Age of Conan that really stressed systems and lost many customers as a result.
 

Frizzo

Distinguished
Sep 17, 2010
599
0
19,010
1920x1080 on a 23" lcd

my gut feeling tells me old republic is going to fail, yet like the rest of us generational star wars fans, i'll buy it anyway.

my guess is with a game like that a oc'ed 2500k + 6870 is going to be about the best performance you will see. unless they are going to utilize gpu more than normal...like you said aoc did this, i never played that game, so dont know much on it.

also for d3. both of these games should be out by jan 2012 right? not seeing much in the cpu/gpu that i should wait for..right?
 

Frizzo

Distinguished
Sep 17, 2010
599
0
19,010
interesting. i know just from browsing around the web, that i've read a lot of people complaining about their 6950. cant say i've ever seen anyone complain about the 6870. as far as the 560ti, it seems over-priced to me. what is the difference between a 560ti and a 560 anyway? last time i checked 560ti was like $240.
 
The processor will be good for a long time +5 years, it is pretty solid and will not need an upgrade.

You can't future proof a GPU, and unlike processors GPU costs don't fall off a lot, a 590 in 3 years time will cost the same as it does now, and will be rather mediocre to cards down the line. I cut costs on this front, the 560 is cheaper than the 6950 and does a more than excellent job.
 


The hot CPU in 2006 would have been the Q6600. It was a quad core that matched the very fastest dual cores and surpassed them in apps that could use 4 cores.... plus it ran much cooler and could be easily overclocked.

It's not considered much these days, but can still work well if overclocked. It was every bit as popular then as the 2500K is now.
 

jackspeed

Distinguished
Jun 29, 2011
648
0
19,060
before my pc died this summer my Q6600 could run sc2 with a 8800gts on medium to low settings and allowed me to play the games I liked ie oblivion, fallout3, masseffect 1, starcraft 2. So the processors can last a while and that was on stock speeds. But if the bulldozer comes out and actually challenges intel then we may see a spike in cpu performance because of competition.
 

monkeysweat

Distinguished
Jan 27, 2009
537
0
19,010
ya, a q6600 was a "champion" cpu of 5 years ago, 'relatively cheap', overclocked well and is a quad core,, if anything it sort of got better with age because games 5 years ago didn't use multiple cores too well, now they do, the only bottleneck toward the end i think would be the old GPUs that were hooked up them (8800 series) but even those cards were pretty good and could be SLI'd for more power. the 2500K is alot like the the 6600 in regards to overclocking and price, I have no doubts it will last 5 years -- same goes for your GPU,, just add another one later or upgrade it when the higher end stuff is cheaper.