H hoopz Reputable Dec 13, 2014 15 0 4,510 May 22, 2015 #1 Specs i7-5820k Gigabyte X99 GA Gaming G1 WIFI G.Skill 16GB DDR-2400 RAM (2x8GB) Geforce GTX Titan Score: 1620 No idea if this is good or bad :/
Specs i7-5820k Gigabyte X99 GA Gaming G1 WIFI G.Skill 16GB DDR-2400 RAM (2x8GB) Geforce GTX Titan Score: 1620 No idea if this is good or bad :/
Solution daniel_blacke May 22, 2015 hoopz : uplink-svk: It's the normal old Titan daniel_blacke: thanks for the link. There are 2 systems that might be comparable to mine that scored 1700 - 1900. Did you try running yours with the settings at the beginning of that link? Perhaps you will score differently.
hoopz : uplink-svk: It's the normal old Titan daniel_blacke: thanks for the link. There are 2 systems that might be comparable to mine that scored 1700 - 1900. Did you try running yours with the settings at the beginning of that link? Perhaps you will score differently.
daniel_blacke Reputable Feb 1, 2015 557 0 5,160 May 22, 2015 #2 Seems a little low for that set up... but idk how you did your settings. Try this out. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/unigine-heaven-4-0-benchmark-scores.198888/ Upvote 0 Downvote
Seems a little low for that set up... but idk how you did your settings. Try this out. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/unigine-heaven-4-0-benchmark-scores.198888/
uplink-svk Distinguished Mar 9, 2013 2,331 39 20,990 May 22, 2015 #3 hoopz - which Titan is it? X, Z? Or normal old Titan? Upvote 0 Downvote
H hoopz Reputable Dec 13, 2014 15 0 4,510 May 22, 2015 #4 uplink-svk: It's the normal old Titan daniel_blacke: thanks for the link. There are 2 systems that might be comparable to mine that scored 1700 - 1900. Upvote 0 Downvote
uplink-svk: It's the normal old Titan daniel_blacke: thanks for the link. There are 2 systems that might be comparable to mine that scored 1700 - 1900.
daniel_blacke Reputable Feb 1, 2015 557 0 5,160 May 22, 2015 Solution #5 hoopz : uplink-svk: It's the normal old Titan daniel_blacke: thanks for the link. There are 2 systems that might be comparable to mine that scored 1700 - 1900. Did you try running yours with the settings at the beginning of that link? Perhaps you will score differently. Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
hoopz : uplink-svk: It's the normal old Titan daniel_blacke: thanks for the link. There are 2 systems that might be comparable to mine that scored 1700 - 1900. Did you try running yours with the settings at the beginning of that link? Perhaps you will score differently.
daniel_blacke Reputable Feb 1, 2015 557 0 5,160 May 22, 2015 #6 I got 1362 with my setup and those settings. Upvote 0 Downvote
H hoopz Reputable Dec 13, 2014 15 0 4,510 May 22, 2015 #7 Good point. I'll try the test again with the settings from the thread. Just curious, how much does the CPU play a role in that score? Upvote 0 Downvote
Good point. I'll try the test again with the settings from the thread. Just curious, how much does the CPU play a role in that score?
daniel_blacke Reputable Feb 1, 2015 557 0 5,160 May 22, 2015 #8 It seems like not as import a role as overclocking your vcard, especially the core clock. At least that's what the data there would seem to imply. If you're really interested, run MSI AB and see what's maxing out, your GPU or your CPU. Heh.. or both. Upvote 0 Downvote
It seems like not as import a role as overclocking your vcard, especially the core clock. At least that's what the data there would seem to imply. If you're really interested, run MSI AB and see what's maxing out, your GPU or your CPU. Heh.. or both.
H hoopz Reputable Dec 13, 2014 15 0 4,510 May 22, 2015 #9 ok, so here's something strange for you. I tested using the settings in that link and here are the results: - with API set to DirectX 11: 1386 (it went down!!) - with API set to DirectX 11: 2004 (it went up!!) What on earth?? Upvote 0 Downvote
ok, so here's something strange for you. I tested using the settings in that link and here are the results: - with API set to DirectX 11: 1386 (it went down!!) - with API set to DirectX 11: 2004 (it went up!!) What on earth??
H hoopz Reputable Dec 13, 2014 15 0 4,510 May 23, 2015 #11 I made a mistake with my last post. This is what it should have said: - with API set to DirectX 11: 1386 - with API set to DirectX 9: 2004 DX11 is much slower than DX9....is that normal?? Upvote 0 Downvote
I made a mistake with my last post. This is what it should have said: - with API set to DirectX 11: 1386 - with API set to DirectX 9: 2004 DX11 is much slower than DX9....is that normal??
madmatt30 Titan Ambassador Jan 1, 2013 24,571 647 91,240 May 23, 2015 #12 hoopz : I made a mistake with my last post. This is what it should have said: - with API set to DirectX 11: 1386 - with API set to DirectX 9: 2004 DX11 is much slower than DX9....is that normal?? dx 9 doesnt support tessellation so yes absolutely normal Upvote 0 Downvote
hoopz : I made a mistake with my last post. This is what it should have said: - with API set to DirectX 11: 1386 - with API set to DirectX 9: 2004 DX11 is much slower than DX9....is that normal?? dx 9 doesnt support tessellation so yes absolutely normal