how much better is the i7 3770k than the amd fx 8350 at video rendering

How much better is the i7 3770k than the amd fx 8350 at rendering video's

  • twice as fast

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • a little bit faster not really noticeable

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • if you have a amd fx 8350 and your thinking about returning it for a i7 3770k dont waste your time

    Votes: 3 100.0%
  • if you have a amd fx 8350 return it and get a i7 3770k it is just that much better ive tried them bo

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
Depends on what codec you plan on using for rendering.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/697?vs=551


If you are talking about DivX, then Intel gives better performance. Using the x.264 codec the i7-3770k performs better on the 1st pass, but the FX-8350 performances better on the 2nd pass. For WMV formats, Intel gives better performance.

I generally prefer Intel CPUs because they have overall better performance and consumes less power. However, they do cost a bit more. I believe under intensive CPU tasks (like video encoding) the FX consumes around 90w - 100w more power.
 
Apr 24, 2013
33
0
10,530
The i7 3770k is better than the fx 8350, but not that much. If you are looking for a cheaper cpu that will run just as fast, and render nearly at the same speeds, I would go for the fx 8350, as it is nearly $130 less than the i7 3770k. But if you do not have a budget and want the better one, go ahead and buy the i7. They are both amazing CPUs to have.