250W is for a duration of 56 secs, unless you keep running and stopping apps all the time the power draw will drop to a constant 125W (worst case) after 56 seconds.Assuming no overclocking that cpu takes approximately 13 watts at idle and up to about 255w on full load. If you assume 50w for the rest of the system you have an approximate range of 63 to 305w depending on workload. Now the VS450 has a maximum efficiency of 85% so let’s assume 80% average. Therefore
Idle = 63w / 0.8 = 79w from the wall
Max load = 305w / 0.8 = 381w from the wall
This is a rough guess and the workload will determine the power needed between idle and max. I will say I would have liked to have seen a high quality psu powering a 9900k system. The VS range are the lowest quality Corsair sell.
It’s their most basic range https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/corsair-vs450-power-supply,6076.htmlWhy is Corsair VS450 a low quality power supply?
Good point250W is for a duration of 56 secs, unless you keep running and stopping apps all the time the power draw will drop to a constant 125W (worst case) after 56 seconds.
Do we have to multiply by 24 because of 24 hours? 79x24 or 381x24?Assuming no overclocking that cpu takes approximately 13 watts at idle and up to about 255w on full load. If you assume 50w for the rest of the system you have an approximate range of 63 to 305w depending on workload. Now the VS450 has a maximum efficiency of 85% so let’s assume 80% average. Therefore
Idle = 63w / 0.8 = 79w from the wall
Max load = 305w / 0.8 = 381w from the wall
This is a rough guess and the workload will determine the power needed between idle and max. I will say I would have liked to have seen a high quality psu powering a 9900k system. The VS range are the lowest quality Corsair sell.
You would have to work out based on your use of the system where your power usage sits between idle and max. Also see TerryLaze’s point about max cpu power.Do we have to multiply by 24 because of 24 hours? 79x24 or 381x24?