No, people DON'T have to do all of that.
Someone is doing it, a whole lot of someones are doing it. Otherwise these programs would not even exist due to lack of demand; and also Windows 11 would've eclipsed Windows 10 in user base a long time ago. But people are consistently rejecting Windows 11 for known reasons.
Besides, it seems like every other week there is a new control panel being rushed out for use for these types of things and there is comment after comment by users here at Tom's griping either of the programs they do use, the programs they pay for,(some of these control panels I don't think are even free) or of the reasons they list in their stated refusal to upgrade to W11. W10 still commands well over 50%.
Every time one of these control panels get introduced its proof that Linux is easier to install. It just is. That's the fact. "
Install and go" is gone from the default MS-provided Windows experience - that's a relic of a bye-gone era. Especially,
especially in an era where Microsoft packs it full of advertisement delivery APIs. Ads on the start menu, ads in the weather app, wherever they are packing these ads in. I would be shocked to discover a decently tech-capable person who finds advertisements like this acceptable and doesn't remove them. Ads in an OS that people are paying money for is just uncivil.
That can be done on the offline install image once and then when you install it's all there.
Oh yeah, wow, how much extra work does _
that_ take?
It's the same as having to manually tweak sysctl.conf on Linux after installation.
Luckily Linux distros got rid of that requirement in the 90's. Optionally, if you chose to make that choice, well, that's you. Its strange that Microsoft would take a two-decades-step backwards such as this when previously it was much, much easier to just install and go. Even stranger that someone would find it a point to brag about when one of two (Linux) doesn't have this requirement and hasn't for years.