Hey people. I have 3 SCSI drives I plan on putting onto an Adaptec 29160 single channel ultra160 controller. All 3 drives are Quantum drives of varying vintage. Here's how I thought of doing it. If you see a better way (as in better in performance) please correct me. The 3 drives would be configured in this manner:
#1 > 1.0 GB 7200 rpm Atlas 1 (circa 1995) SE Wide HDD on SE connector >> WINNT 4.0 Workstation
#2 > 4.2 GB 7200 rpm Atlas II SE Wide HDD on SE connector >> very small apps + storage for drivers, service pack, not much else
#3 > 9.1 GB 10000 rpm ultra 160 Atlas 10KII HDD on LVD connector >> multi partitions for; halflife, office2k, 2 GB swap file (twice my ram), other stuff
Do you think I should install WINNT on drive 2 instead since its a considerably newer drive, and use the older 1 GB drive for device driver storage instead? Also, I will eventually be adding an identical Atlas 10KII and use NT's disk administrator to run the 2 in RAID 0 for extra performance.
Whadda ya all think?
Cheers,
Ron_Jeremy
If you loan a friend $20 & never see them again, it was worth it.
#1 > 1.0 GB 7200 rpm Atlas 1 (circa 1995) SE Wide HDD on SE connector >> WINNT 4.0 Workstation
#2 > 4.2 GB 7200 rpm Atlas II SE Wide HDD on SE connector >> very small apps + storage for drivers, service pack, not much else
#3 > 9.1 GB 10000 rpm ultra 160 Atlas 10KII HDD on LVD connector >> multi partitions for; halflife, office2k, 2 GB swap file (twice my ram), other stuff
Do you think I should install WINNT on drive 2 instead since its a considerably newer drive, and use the older 1 GB drive for device driver storage instead? Also, I will eventually be adding an identical Atlas 10KII and use NT's disk administrator to run the 2 in RAID 0 for extra performance.
Whadda ya all think?
Cheers,
Ron_Jeremy
If you loan a friend $20 & never see them again, it was worth it.