Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (
More info?)
Tony wrote:
>"Bob Headrick" <bobh@proaxis.com> wrote:
>
>
>><Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
>>
>>
>>>Tony wrote:
>>>There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>>>there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
>>>on
>>>the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>>>cartridges.
>>>
>>>
>>Not necessarily. See:
>>http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
>>also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
>>line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.
>>
>>
Absolutely
>>Regards,
>>Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>>
>>
>>
>Just looked at the report, it's a little old but well done, is there a more
>recent analysis that you know of? My views stated above have been developed
>over the past 6 months (the period that we have kept data on failed new
>cartridges, we did this because we were getting what seemed to be a higher
>number of failures than before across the board). If HP cartridges are more
>reliable than compatibles we would have to take that into serious consideration
>when choosing our suppliers.
>Tony
>
>
You cannot believe Tony Da Tiger.