HP 950c/PC World cartridge

Ian

Distinguished
Apr 5, 2004
820
0
18,980
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

I just bought a HO5 black cartridge from PC World that is sold as being
compatible with my HP 950c, but when I fitted it, I got the blinking light
and the "not compatible" message. Is there anything I can try, or is a trip
back to PC World?

Thanks,
Ian
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Ian
I suspect they have sold you the wrong cartridge (maybe incorrectly labelled, I
have seen that once or twice). You could try to clean the contacts on the back
of the cartridge but if it was mine I would take it back.
Tony


"Ian" <ian@amajor.com> wrote:
>I just bought a HO5 black cartridge from PC World that is sold as being
>compatible with my HP 950c, but when I fitted it, I got the blinking light
>and the "not compatible" message. Is there anything I can try, or is a trip
>back to PC World?
>
>Thanks,
>Ian
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Tony da Tiger knows when it come to incorrectly or minimally label garbagge

Tony wrote:

>Ian
>I suspect they have sold you the wrong cartridge (maybe incorrectly labelled, I
>have seen that once or twice). You could try to clean the contacts on the back
>of the cartridge but if it was mine I would take it back.
>Tony
>
>
>"Ian" <ian@amajor.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I just bought a HO5 black cartridge from PC World that is sold as being
>>compatible with my HP 950c, but when I fitted it, I got the blinking light
>>and the "not compatible" message. Is there anything I can try, or is a trip
>>back to PC World?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

measekite wrote:
> Tony da Tiger knows when it come to incorrectly or minimally label garbagge

He's shown a lot more character than you have douche bag.(<-notice the
correct spelling of douche)
Get lost.
Frank
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Frank wrote:

> measekite wrote:
>
>> Tony da Tiger knows when it come to incorrectly or minimally label
>> garbagge
>
>
> He's shown a lot more character than you have douche bag.(<-notice the
> correct spelling of douche)
> Get lost.
> Frank


Hi Frankie :-*
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Tony wrote:
There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed on
the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
cartridges.
Tony

measekite <measekite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>Frank wrote:
>
>> measekite wrote:
>>
>>> Tony da Tiger knows when it come to incorrectly or minimally label
>>> garbagge
>>
>>
>> He's shown a lot more character than you have douche bag.(<-notice the
>> correct spelling of douche)
>> Get lost.
>> Frank
>
>
>Hi Frankie :-*
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Tony wrote:

>Tony wrote:
>There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>there are in all industries.
>

Tony da Tiger is speaking from experience. He really knows.

>Also the cartridge in question may have failed on
>the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>cartridges.
>Tony
>
>measekite <measekite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Frank wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>measekite wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Tony da Tiger knows when it come to incorrectly or minimally label
>>>>garbagge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>He's shown a lot more character than you have douche bag.(<-notice the
>>>correct spelling of douche)
>>>Get lost.
>>>Frank
>>>
>>>
>>Hi Frankie :-*
>>
>>
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

<Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
> Tony wrote:
> There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
> there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
> on
> the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
> cartridges.

Not necessarily. See:
http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.

Regards,
Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Thanks, Tony - seems it was faulty - I took it back and exchanged it for
another, which is fine.


<Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
> Tony wrote:
> There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less
than
> there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have
failed on
> the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
> cartridges.
> Tony
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"Bob Headrick" <bobh@proaxis.com> wrote:
>
><Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
>> Tony wrote:
>> There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>> there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
>> on
>> the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>> cartridges.
>
>Not necessarily. See:
>http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
>also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
>line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.
>
>Regards,
>Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>
Fair enough Bob
I was speaking from my own experience and have not done any external research.
I certainly see lots of failed OEM cartridges (not necessarily HP).
Tony
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Bob Headrick wrote:

><Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
>
>
>>Tony wrote:
>>There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>>there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
>>on
>>the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>>cartridges.
>>
>>
>
>Not necessarily. See:
>http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
>also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
>line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.
>
>

He is probably right but Tony da Tiger does not want to here this
because he sells the aftermarket junk.

>Regards,
>Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Tony wrote:

>"Bob Headrick" <bobh@proaxis.com> wrote:
>
>
>><Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
>>
>>
>>>Tony wrote:
>>>There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>>>there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
>>>on
>>>the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>>>cartridges.
>>>
>>>
>>Not necessarily. See:
>>http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
>>also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
>>line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>>
>>
>>
>Fair enough Bob
>I was speaking from my own experience and have not done any external research.
>I certainly see lots of failed OEM cartridges (not necessarily HP).
>Tony
>
>

Poor Tonee da Tiger
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"Bob Headrick" <bobh@proaxis.com> wrote:
>
><Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
>> Tony wrote:
>> There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>> there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
>> on
>> the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>> cartridges.
>
>Not necessarily. See:
>http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
>also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
>line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.
>
>Regards,
>Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>
Just looked at the report, it's a little old but well done, is there a more
recent analysis that you know of? My views stated above have been developed
over the past 6 months (the period that we have kept data on failed new
cartridges, we did this because we were getting what seemed to be a higher
number of failures than before across the board). If HP cartridges are more
reliable than compatibles we would have to take that into serious consideration
when choosing our suppliers.
Tony
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Tony wrote:

>"Bob Headrick" <bobh@proaxis.com> wrote:
>
>
>><Tony> wrote in message news:117m53d4ok8a44@news.supernews.com...
>>
>>
>>>Tony wrote:
>>>There are some bad practitioners in this business, no more and no less than
>>>there are in all industries. Also the cartridge in question may have failed
>>>on
>>>the shelf (not uncommon), this happens to OEM just as often as non-OEM
>>>cartridges.
>>>
>>>
>>Not necessarily. See:
>>http://www.hp.com/sbso/product/supplies/supplies_reliability_ink.pdf. I have
>>also seen similar tests for Epson although I have lost the link. the bottom
>>line - the OEM cartridges were much more reliable than the alternatives.
>>
>>
Absolutely

>>Regards,
>>Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>>
>>
>>
>Just looked at the report, it's a little old but well done, is there a more
>recent analysis that you know of? My views stated above have been developed
>over the past 6 months (the period that we have kept data on failed new
>cartridges, we did this because we were getting what seemed to be a higher
>number of failures than before across the board). If HP cartridges are more
>reliable than compatibles we would have to take that into serious consideration
>when choosing our suppliers.
>Tony
>
>

You cannot believe Tony Da Tiger.