I am almost exclusively a mid-range phone buyer, as I don't do contract service. I actually bought an HTC One V, but never opened it. It was $150 with ICS vanilla and great reviews. But it didn't quite have all the features I wanted, and was worried by the single core processor. I returned it, and again went to an LG phone, the Motion 4G, for $150 also. Man, what a great choice. It has just about every feature I want and need. I don't really understand why it is considered a mid-tier phone when it performes better than some lower-upper tier phones like the Evo and the Atrix 2. The only thing less potent about this phone is its smaller size, which in my case, I prefer.
To be honest, I think LG makes the most balanced mid-tier phones around. The Optimus V (in all its flavors) were solid, and cost reasonable amounts when released. Their dumb/feature phones were always reliable and intuitive.
And Samsung... Man, they make great tier 1 phones, but anything less, ANYTHING, any mid-to-low grade Samsung phone, including their feature/dumb phones are all TRASH. Their dumb phones are hard to use, slow and have bad battery life. LG phones run circles around their low to mid end Samsung Android phones. Samsung never updates their non-flagship phones either. LG was sending me updates to my Optimus V for a long time. I just got an update on my LG Motion 4G last night!
Except for the GSIII, I can NEVER recomend Samsung. They don't make even decent phones other than their top tier offerings.
LG is always my go to brand. HTC would be close if their prices were a little lower.