i5-4460 Vs i5-4590 for gaming

heartattack007

Reputable
Jan 14, 2015
26
0
4,530
the price difference is only about 10 dollars between the two i was also considering getting an i3-4370 since ive heard its more than good enought to run the games I want to run, I have a EVGA GTX 760 and 8gb of ram, which should i choose? thanks for your help!
 
Solution
Either i5 is fine, you probably won't notice ANY difference between the two. The i3 would work as well, but you'll get better frame rates and a little smoother game play with the i5. The i3 only has 4mb of cache and two actual cores with hyperthreading. The i5's have 4 actual cores and 6mb of cache. The performance is tangible with the actual cores.
Either i5 is fine, you probably won't notice ANY difference between the two. The i3 would work as well, but you'll get better frame rates and a little smoother game play with the i5. The i3 only has 4mb of cache and two actual cores with hyperthreading. The i5's have 4 actual cores and 6mb of cache. The performance is tangible with the actual cores.
 
Solution


i think its because the 4570 is haswell and the 4460 is haswell refresh

the original haswell version of the 4460 was the 4440.

i dunno - just correct me if im wrong because im not sure hahaha..
 


hmm i got a i5-4460 8gb 1600mhz cl9 of ram and a r9 270x which is comparable to a gtx 760

can play farcry 4 patch 1.5 at all ultra, 2x msaa, hbao+, godrays enhanced @ 1680x1050 resolution with FPS of a minimum of 27 fps and maximum of 31 fps

played crysis 3 very high textures, very high presets, fxaa, motion blur disabled, lens flare on, x16 antistrophic filtering @ 3840x1024 resolution with 30 fps minimum and 35 fps maximum

played battlefield 4 single player all ultra, msaa x4, hbao+ @ 1680x1050 with minimum 50 fps and maximum 60 fps

expect your gtx 760 to be about 5 fps faster than the r9 270x
 
The Haswell refresh chips DO support some instructions not supported on previous Haswell CPUs, along with some architectural changes. The differences are not outstanding and may not even be utilized for another generation as they require software engineered to take advantage of new instruction capabilities. Either chip would have been fine but newer is usually better so it's probably good you went with a refresh chip anyhow.