Yes, I agree. The variance between monitors can be as great as that between different models/brands. Generally, high price and reputable heritage means something especially in the high end lineup.
badlog simply won't accept that iiyama has been generally been known as one of the better value monitors. He fails to acknowledge mitsubishi's reputation as generally top notch. This is the main point I've been trying convey to go-bald, simple for those who've researched.
His statements are psuedo-objective that I feared he would mislead many. I had to correct his/her obstinate and childish prattle more than flash my own pom poms.
No, doubt you too noticed his/her rather obnoxious, vexing, and incoherent interjections. I had to scratch the itch.
I hope i've not littered too much in my mutual condescension with oldbag. I can only hope the trails contain some reviews and information sought by the hungry who come here to feed. I know I that's why I came here, and am grateful.
forgive the corny anagrams, I couldn't resist!
Quality is better than name brand, even regarding beloved AMD.