I personally think that the i3-4130 is a better CPU than the 6300. It also has a better upgrade path and performs better or as well in just about every game out there.
I personally think that the i3-4130 is a better CPU than the 6300. It also has a better upgrade path and performs better or as well in just about every game out there.
In my opinion me and RazerZ can agree AMD would be the better route for this build. Fx-6300 is better multi core performance and the i3 has the single core performance. AMD would be the better route cause its going to be a gaming computer it would benefit more on multi core performance even though the GPU does do most of the work the CPU is just as important. Here where i get my info from @Startrek2013 a great poster on these forums. http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1928890/4130-6300-gaming.html
I personally think that the i3-4130 is a better CPU than the 6300. It also has a better upgrade path and performs better or as well in just about every game out there.
In my opinion me and RazerZ can agree AMD would be the better route for this build. Fx-6300 is better multi core performance and the i3 has the single core performance. AMD would be the better route cause its going to be a gaming computer it would benefit more on multi core performance even though the GPU does do most of the work the CPU is just as important. Here where i get my info from @Startrek2013 a great poster on these forums.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1928890/4130-6300-gaming.html
Agreed. I3 is single core and you definitely want more of a kick than that.
I personally think that the i3-4130 is a better CPU than the 6300. It also has a better upgrade path and performs better or as well in just about every game out there.
The Haswell i3-4130 is a dual core CPU with hyperthreading, this effectively gives it 4 cores. It has 50% better singlethreaded performance than the 6300 and only 10-20% lower multithreaded performance in computational benchmarks. Those benchmarks have no bearing on in game performance. Here's why:
Game engines require CPUs to perform certain tasks. Some of these can be parallelized onto other cores and executed simultaneously. However, the majority of these tasks cannot be parallelized and must be executed by a single core. This creates a pattern of diminishing returns with # of CPU cores that ends right around 4 cores. Now imagine the 6300 with only 4 cores vs the i3 with (effectively) the same number. This is where the singlethreaded performance is so important. The i3 can finish the unparallelized task SO much faster than the 6300 that the extra 2 cores of the FX chip are irrelevant. (For more information, look up "Amdahl's Law")
If you don't believe the theory, look at the numbers. Below are CPU benchmarks for one of the few games that can use all of the 6300's cores.
A 3rd generation i3 matches the performance of better CPUs than the 6300. Now imagine what the more powerful Haswell could do.
Additionally, the AM3+ socket is dead. There is nothing there for a gamer who cares about futureproofing. The 1150 socket however is still new. You can upgrade to a 4770 from the 4130, and the i7 is more powerful than any upgrade from AMD.
There's just no reason to get an FX chip.
Sorry, those are misleading benchmarks. Regardless, the bottom line is, the i3 will perform as well or better as the 6300 in the majority of games and has a MUCH better upgrade path.
Sorry, those are misleading benchmarks. Regardless, the bottom line is, the i3 will perform as well or better as the 6300 in the majority of games and has a MUCH better upgrade path.
Games dont fully utilize the hyperthreading...... Its up to the buyer if he wants a quad core AMD CPU or an Dual core Intel. Im going full AMD on this build.
Sorry, those are misleading benchmarks. Regardless, the bottom line is, the i3 will perform as well or better as the 6300 in the majority of games and has a MUCH better upgrade path.
Games dont fully utilize the hyperthreading...... Its up to the buyer if he wants a quad core AMD CPU or an Dual core Intel. Im going full AMD on this build.
They do, I was just wrong about how effective it is. It's about a 15% performance boost over a non hyperthreaded dual core.
The i5 build is more well rounded, but I would rather have a GTX 770 than a GTX 760. It's an easier upgrade from the i3 to the i5 than the 760 to the 770. $180-220 CPU upgrade vs a $300-360 GPU upgrade.