i know there have been a million threads about this already, but they all eventually turn into a war between Nvidia and AMD fans. i would appreciate it if we can keep it civil and have the argument's basis included.
im currently using an AMD hd5770, this should give an idea of how long i tend to use my components before replacing them.
i was pretty set on getting the gtx1060 but have been seeing a lot of people talk about how AMD cards age way better.
atm i'm waiting for amazon UK to get cards in stock so i can order to Israel. and it seems that the rx480 8gb will actually cost me more than a 1060 6gb.
because of that i ordered an evga sc 1060 for 250 € (including shipping and tax).
atm i cant find a listing for less than 250€ before shipping and tax's for an rx480.
is it still worth considering it over the evga card?
im currently using an AMD hd5770, this should give an idea of how long i tend to use my components before replacing them.
i was pretty set on getting the gtx1060 but have been seeing a lot of people talk about how AMD cards age way better.
atm i'm waiting for amazon UK to get cards in stock so i can order to Israel. and it seems that the rx480 8gb will actually cost me more than a 1060 6gb.
because of that i ordered an evga sc 1060 for 250 € (including shipping and tax).
atm i cant find a listing for less than 250€ before shipping and tax's for an rx480.
is it still worth considering it over the evga card?