Inside Western Digital: How Tomorrow's Storage Gets Made

Status
Not open for further replies.

johnbilicki

Distinguished
Jul 10, 2006
89
0
18,630
0
There are a lot of DOA complaints on Newegg and even with 40% of that place is required to make sure the drive works before it leaves the building it still has to go through shipping...UPS shows up eight hours after FedEx and the drive it dead because during shipping your package was the substitute baby for 'kick the baby'.
 

anamaniac

Distinguished
Jan 7, 2009
2,447
0
19,790
1
Awesome. =D
I've switched to Samsung drives though. ^_^

And at the pic on page 26, she's checking her farmville. (At my job we hired an insanely expensive technician to fix some really expensive equipment, which he did with his laptop... and he has checking his farmville... at a few hundred dollars per hour on the company dime of course.)

Interesting that there appeared to be no drainage for the emergency shower. They just jerry rig that thing up at the last moment and hope no one has to use it?

Also, that walkthrough video is quite depressing. Yellow rooms as far as the eye can see, without a smile in sight.

Thank you very much for this wonderful article. As much as I'd like to, I doubt I could ever work there, because my handa aren't stable enough just to take a damned picture, nevermind handle extremely precise equipment. =)

But I wonder, how many drive failures have they had because an employee dropped a contact into the drive?

Also, great to see that little sneak preview on WD NAND based storage.

Now, how about Intel and 32nm?
 

jhanschu

Distinguished
Feb 20, 2009
21
0
18,510
0
I'm under the assumption that most of the pictures were taken in a "clean room" environment. As such, the floor grating would be elevated (as previously mentioned) for the laminar air flow and there may possibly be a drain below. Also if I noticed correctly, the ceiling "tiles" were actually HEPA filters.
 

g00ey

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2009
470
0
18,790
3
I'm not buying that every step visualized on these photos are being applied to each and every platter that is manufactured on this facility. For example I don't think they examine the layers of every platter in the TEM. I believe the photos don't only show the manufacturing line but also some of the research facilities for next generation products.

I think the manufacturing process is very much like an assembly line process where the production flow is rather fluent which is not the impression I get at a first glance when looking through these photos. They obviously achieve som degree of economies of scale. It would be interesting too see some figures such as how long it takes to produce a platter, head, and so on and how many units/components per hour that is being produced etc.

Then look at for example picture 28 (or 25-32); I don't understand how these large electoplated platters turn into read/write heads of a harddrive. I don't see the part where these wafers are punched into small needles (sliders/heads) and how this is done.
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,079
0
20,810
9
I find it marvelous to see all this expensive hightech and amongst those things find old crt monitors and I think in one picture about #20 I even spotted an old hp dx2000 in the right side of an image (in front of an older 13" or so crt. Really nice to see expensive mashinery associated with expensive downtime being operated using windows antique and old hardware. Seems you don't always NEED a quadcore to be effective.

Great article btw. Not sure I share the authors humor, but I suppose it beats kevins.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Nice walktrough but hey it's 2010. You should put bigger, less compressed images than these 1999. thumbnail sized pics.
 

r0x0r

Distinguished
May 9, 2006
1,005
0
19,280
0
[citation][nom]Kubiksovs[/nom]Nice walktrough but hey it's 2010. You should put bigger, less compressed images than these 1999. thumbnail sized pics.[/citation]

Click the zoom button then click on the image you want to see at full size
 

Jaans

Distinguished
Dec 21, 2008
4
0
18,510
0
Please, these images are too small. At this size you might as well leave them out. At least offer the option to see a much larger image when clicking on image.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
Clicking once opens the gallery. Clicking the image in the gallery will open the full-sized shot. I know there is some debate as to the efficiency of this three-click process (mainly, it's not), and I've opened up some dialog here with regards to ways we can improve it. In the meantime, however, I simply right-click->open in new tab when I want to use the gallery without losing my place in the editorial content.
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,079
0
20,810
9
[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]Clicking once opens the gallery. Clicking the image in the gallery will open the full-sized shot. I know there is some debate as to the efficiency of this three-click process (mainly, it's not), and I've opened up some dialog here with regards to ways we can improve it. In the meantime, however, I simply right-click->open in new tab when I want to use the gallery without losing my place in the editorial content.[/citation]
When you enter the dialogue consider suggesting the designers to make scripts perform according to standards. After all the javascript bugs have been around for like a year now without anyone solving it. (the one where, in ie7,ie8,chrome or firefox3, clicking submit just gives a 'javsscript void' statement in the status bar but doesn't submit anything ; usually rating and citing doesn't work in those situations either, but not always) or perhaps suggest making the talkback equal on both toms hardware and guide. Sometimes on toms guide the links to talkback aren't in the 'news' section of the forum which generates a different layout where our belowed avatars are still shown but the citation and rating features are less available due to design.
Also the login bug should be adressed some time - u know ... the one in ie where you're being redirected to an error page if you don't press escape quickly enough (to stop faulty script playback likely caused by the adds).
Anyway the gallery's annoying too ofc. Not only the fact that images aren't sorted in the order the article uses them, but also the multistage opening you mentioned.
 

g00ey

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2009
470
0
18,790
3
[citation][nom]gtvr[/nom]background of image 2 - guy with a beard and no face mask?[/citation]
A pub with no beer and a man with no beard ...
 

Zink

Distinguished
Oct 25, 2009
12
0
18,510
0
Stop using this picturestory layout. Do it in pages or with a flash version that doesn't reload the whole page every time.
 

cadder

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2008
1,707
0
19,860
43
Despite the click-click-click process, the images were great.

For quite awhile I've bought only WD drives. This gives me even more faith in the company.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY