[citation][nom]pwnorbpwnd[/nom]10,000 nm process vs. 32 nm the win is obviously going to go to the 4004[/citation]
I thought so, but I just want to be sure AMD has the edge over Intel.
[citation][nom]BlackHawk91[/nom]Let's get back in time: Which is the oldest intel CPU that you currently have laying around? Mine is a not so old Intel 80486DX2[/citation]
486 or 386, I keep forgetting 😀 Fully functional, just need to solder one of the chips on the VGA card back on. Then Celeron 500 MHz, then Celeron M 900 MHz, then Celeron M 1.8 GHz and then i7-2600 which FINALLY broke the Celeron curse for me
[citation][nom]BlackHawk91[/nom]Let's get back in time: Which is the oldest intel CPU that you currently have laying around? Mine is a not so old Intel 80486DX2[/citation]
Earliest was a Pentium II, not with us any more though. P4's still in service, so is a Pentium M, both roughly the same age i think...
[citation][nom]BlackHawk91[/nom]Let's get back in time: Which is the oldest intel CPU that you currently have laying around? Mine is a not so old Intel 80486DX2[/citation]
Doubt either of them would work without a lot of work.
EDIT - after a bit more research my Compaq has an 8088 processor in it. Ahh, fond memories of that machine. I learned how to program PASCAL on it. Which was a lot more fun then assembly on a Commodore 64.
[citation][nom]BlackHawk91[/nom]Let's get back in time: Which is the oldest intel CPU that you currently have laying around? Mine is a not so old Intel 80486DX2[/citation]