http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2004q1/cpu2000-20040210-02867.html
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2004q1/cpu2000-20040210-02867.html
They were able to produce a score higher with prescott that with NW that have a 200 mghz advantage.That what we call a miracle or something that i dont get.Prescott is also faster.
For nocona that will get worse Gzip performance drop by 40% on prescott.There were 1 good point for netburst in webserver was good performance with compresion.Intel can say bye bye to webbase server at this rate intel reputation cannot overcome this 50% lag in performance.
i need to change useur name.
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2004q1/cpu2000-20040210-02867.html
They were able to produce a score higher with prescott that with NW that have a 200 mghz advantage.That what we call a miracle or something that i dont get.Prescott is also faster.
For nocona that will get worse Gzip performance drop by 40% on prescott.There were 1 good point for netburst in webserver was good performance with compresion.Intel can say bye bye to webbase server at this rate intel reputation cannot overcome this 50% lag in performance.
i need to change useur name.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram