Intel Core i7-3770K Review: A Small Step Up From Sandy Bridge

Status
Not open for further replies.

tecmo34

Administrator
Moderator
Nice Review Chris...

Looking forward to the further information coming out this week on Ivy Bridge, as I was initially planning on buying Ivy Bridge, but now I might turn to Sandy Bridge-E
 
Great and long waited review - Thanks Chris!

Temps as expected are high on the IB, but better than early ES which is very good.

Those with their SB or SB-E (K/X) should be feeling good about now ;)
 

xtremexx

Honorable
Apr 23, 2012
1
0
10,510
0
saw this just pop up on google, posted 1 min ago, anyway im probably going to update i have a core i3 2100 so this is pretty good.
 

ojas

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2011
2,924
0
20,810
15
it's heeearrree!!!!! lol i though intel wan't launching it, been scouring the web for an hour for some mention.

Now, time to read the review. :D
 

zanny

Distinguished
Jul 18, 2008
214
0
18,680
0
It gets higher temps at lower frequencies? What the hell did Intel break?

I really wish they would introduce a gaming platform between their stupidly overpriced x79esque server platform and the integrated graphics chips they are pushing mainstream. 50% more transistors should be 30% or so more performance or a much smaller chip, but gamers get nothing out of Ivy Bridge.
 

JAYDEEJOHN

Champion
Moderator
It makes sense Intel is making this its quickest ramp ever, as they see ARM on the horizon in today's changing market.
They're using their process to get to places they'll need to get to in the future
 

verbalizer

Distinguished
May 28, 2010
2,930
0
20,960
96
OK after reading most of the review and definitely studying the charts;
I have a few things on my mind.

1.) AMD - C'mon and get it together, you need to do better...
2.) imagine if Intel made an i7-2660K or something like the i5-2550K they have now.
3.) SB-E is not for gaming (too highly priced...) compared to i7 or i5 Sandy Bridge
4.) Ivy Bridge runs hot.......
5.) IB average 3.7% faster than i7 SB and only 16% over i5 SB = not worth it
6.) AMD - C'mon and get it together, you need to do better...

(moderator edit..)
 

Pezcore27

Distinguished
Feb 8, 2012
518
0
19,060
28
Good review.

To me it shows 2 main things. 1) that Ivy didn't improve on Sandy Bridge as much as Intel was hoping it would, and 2) just how far behind AMD actually is...
 

tmk221

Distinguished
Jul 27, 2008
173
0
18,690
4
It's a shame that this chip is marginally faster than 2700k. I guess it's all AMD fault. there is simply no pressure on Intel. Otherwise they would already moved to 8, 6, and 4 cores processors. Especially now when they have 4 cores under 77W.

Yea yea I know most apps won't use 8 cores, but that's only because there was no 8 cores processors in past, not the other way around
 

pacioli

Distinguished
Nov 22, 2010
1,040
0
19,360
36
I don't know what to say... I'm not feeling jittery about upgrading and blowing $ on a new system... That is good I guess.
I would have liked to see a bigger jump in performance. I'm still very satisfied with the i5 2500K system I built last year... This may actually be bad for Intel as they simply didn't innovate as much as I thought they would...
 

MKBL

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2011
415
0
18,810
16
It has been rumored that Ivy Bridge will be more expensive than comparable Sandy Bridge because of limited launch supply for a while. Is that right that Intel really will set Ivy's price low?
 

duckwithnukes

Honorable
Apr 23, 2012
5
0
10,510
0
I was more interested in the peak power consumption difference between Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge while running the processors at full load. That's where the real savings in power will be attained.

It's clear that while idling, there won't be much of a difference.

Too bad Tomshardware dropped the ball on that one.
 

halcyon

Splendid
Dec 4, 2004
5,566
0
25,810
40
[citation][nom]sublime2k[/nom]Now I'm happy for buying 2500K instead of waiting for IB.[/citation]
I went with the 2500K too...but I kinda wish I'd gone with a 2700K...even if it is just for gaming. IB is beyond what I need right now...this month at least.
 

oxiide

Distinguished
Nov 8, 2011
850
0
19,360
108
I don't personally think anyone was recommending waiting for Ivy Bridge because they expected a huge performance gain. I think the idea was that for the same price as Sandy Bridge's equivalent, you could get a little more performance, a little less power use and some preferable features.
 
G

Guest

Guest
How does the i7-2700K finish the Complete Tom's Hardware Benchmark Suite faster than the i7-3770K, but the i7-3770K is on average 3.7% faster?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY