News Intel Core i9-10900K Listed With 5.1 GHz Boost Clock

[Admin]

Inte's next-generation 10-core flagship chip, the Intel Core i9-10900K, is now listed in 3DMark.

Intel Core i9-10900K Listed With 5.1 GHz Boost Clock : Read more

 

[octavecode]

10 cores 14nm chip,add a huge heasink/fan and you got yourself a really expensive room heater.

 

[tiggers97]

10 cores 14nm chip,add a huge heasink/fan and you got yourself a really expensive room heater.

I'm thinkinkg removing the side panel of a case, and just puting a 20" house fan in it's place should work....

 

[derekullo]

I'm thinkinkg removing the side panel of a case, and just puting a 20" house fan in it's place should work....

As your room slowly heats up to 50°C ...

 

[hannibal]

Just sell heating service to your neighborhood 😉

 

[sirocu]

Yes, some brands of CPUs can get even hotter, but still can't reach to 5.0HGz. 🤣

 

[kyzarvs]

Yes, some brands of CPUs can get even hotter, but still can't reach to 5.0HGz. 🤣

whichever way you look at it, 14nm doesn't cut it. Too hot, no space for cores - why would anyone buy one?

 

[AFoxNamedXyler]

Yes, some brands of CPUs can get even hotter, but still can't reach to 5.0HGz. 🤣

You aren't getting 5.1ghz on all 10 cores with a Hyper 212Evo, just saying

 

[gggplaya]

Yea, boost clock on this chip is really an irrelevant number. Once you load up those cores, this thing will throttle like crazy from all the heat.

It will be interesting to see this thing go up against my 3900x.

 

[Diddly]

yet another motherboard/socket - not very green intel!

 

[TerryLaze]

Yea, boost clock on this chip is really an irrelevant number. Once you load up those cores, this thing will throttle like crazy from all the heat.

It will be interesting to see this thing go up against my 3900x.

What heat are you talking about?
The only use case where heat will be a problem is in full AVX load and whoever uses that already knows not to use the highest clocks possible.
In any other workload power usage is extremely low and on the same general level as ryzen 3xxx series.

Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ryzen-9-3900x-7-3700x-review,6214-3.html
i9-9900k default settings in AIDA 113W ,R7 3700X with PBO 111W, same thing.

 

[Gurg]

Evidently there are enough Time Spy CPU results posted for the 10900k that guru3d included them in their TS CPU shoot out chart. Shows 18% increase over 9900k score. 13142 vs 11095. Pretty impressive.

https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/core-i9-10900k-cpu-score-spotted-in-3dmark-lets-chart-that-up.html