Both (Intel & AMD) latest CPU's are extremely fast. And so, in my eyes, it's childish to say "A mops the floor with B", just because one CPU has few fps more in majority of games games. Keep in mind, that benchmarks are done in controlled environment and real life usage is way different.
Means, depending on CPU (Intel or AMD) temperatures, we will suffer more or less performance drop. Many probably won't even know that's happening, because it's "normal" for (full load) CPU to run at 95°C/100°C. So for example, 13900K will run at 100°C no matter what cooler we use, however performance will be far from benchmarks, in case of less than ideal cooling solution.
When AMD's 7000 CPU's were introduced, I was quite disappointed by amount of power usage. But what Intel has done is.. just insane. I mean, at the end, no matter what cooling solution chosen, all that wattage (=heat) is dissipated in our room!
..maybe I should put a patent for idea on how to build-in a coffee expresso machine into PC case...
About efficiency... I think it's clear that AMD performs quite better. Here's the link at the timeline which shows exactly that:
Bogdan
Means, depending on CPU (Intel or AMD) temperatures, we will suffer more or less performance drop. Many probably won't even know that's happening, because it's "normal" for (full load) CPU to run at 95°C/100°C. So for example, 13900K will run at 100°C no matter what cooler we use, however performance will be far from benchmarks, in case of less than ideal cooling solution.
When AMD's 7000 CPU's were introduced, I was quite disappointed by amount of power usage. But what Intel has done is.. just insane. I mean, at the end, no matter what cooling solution chosen, all that wattage (=heat) is dissipated in our room!
..maybe I should put a patent for idea on how to build-in a coffee expresso machine into PC case...
About efficiency... I think it's clear that AMD performs quite better. Here's the link at the timeline which shows exactly that:
Bogdan