After reading several posts in the forums and posting a new build myself, i find myself in need of some clarification if possible. Like most i plan on building a 'budget gaming rig' (BF3 is the heaviest i will be playing) with a dedicated graphics card. With that in mind it made since to me to choose a CPU w/o an integrated graphics chip, specifically the Intel Core i5-2380P Sandy Bridge 3.1GHz (3.4GHz Turbo Boost) LGA 1155 Quad-Core Desktop Processor BX80623i52380P( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115232 ). However, like most the the i5-2500k was recommend as the best alternative. This particular CPU comes with integrated graphics. Why not recommend the i5-2500. It is my understanding that the 'K' represents an ease of OC. Is the none K w/o integrated graphics unable to OC, which does not seem the case or does the added integrated graphics give larger gains when OC?
In addition to this the mobo seems to play some roll in these chips w/ and w/o the Integrated graphics. I have read some postings stating that the, and please correct me if im wrong, 67 does not utilize the integrated graphics on some CPUs, but gives overclockablility. Does mobo chipsets utilize the integrated graphics to increase the overclockability of these particular CPUs?
I know that that was a mouth full but any links or information would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Ugoaway
In addition to this the mobo seems to play some roll in these chips w/ and w/o the Integrated graphics. I have read some postings stating that the, and please correct me if im wrong, 67 does not utilize the integrated graphics on some CPUs, but gives overclockablility. Does mobo chipsets utilize the integrated graphics to increase the overclockability of these particular CPUs?
I know that that was a mouth full but any links or information would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Ugoaway