First of all, for all those who are saying Intel is dead - I dont think so. They still remain powerful, even if like a wounded tiger. AMD has been seen pushing hard for 64bit apps in including windows. But looks like <b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19112" target="_new">Intel changes likely to force WinXP 64 delay</A></b> and this does show Intel controls technology no matter how much AMD pushes.
In anycase back to the main article:
<b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19113" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19113</A></b>
Some features <b><i>"include 1066MHz front side buses, twin channel DDR2-667, four Serial ATA-II, RAID 0/1/5/10 AHCI, iAMT (active management technology), ADD2+ Media Card, PCI Express X16 GFX, eight USB 2.0, and six PCI Express X1 expansion slots."</b></i>
Also, Intel's official cancellation of the 4.0GHz Pentium 4 is only the beginning of their problems. The 65nm variant called Cedar Mill, if it ever comes out, is only expected to clock to 4.4GHz, a piddling increase. <b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19110" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19110</A></b>. Maybe their change in roadmap is a better step into the future.
A discussion of dual core problems can be found <b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=17906" target="_new">here</b></A>.
:tongue: <A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/priyajeet/fing.jpg" target="_new"><i><font color=red>Very funny, Scotty.</font color=red><font color=blue> Now beam down my clothes.</font color=blue></i></A> :tongue: <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by priyajeet on 10/16/04 05:04 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
In anycase back to the main article:
<b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19113" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19113</A></b>
Some features <b><i>"include 1066MHz front side buses, twin channel DDR2-667, four Serial ATA-II, RAID 0/1/5/10 AHCI, iAMT (active management technology), ADD2+ Media Card, PCI Express X16 GFX, eight USB 2.0, and six PCI Express X1 expansion slots."</b></i>
Also, Intel's official cancellation of the 4.0GHz Pentium 4 is only the beginning of their problems. The 65nm variant called Cedar Mill, if it ever comes out, is only expected to clock to 4.4GHz, a piddling increase. <b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19110" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19110</A></b>. Maybe their change in roadmap is a better step into the future.
A discussion of dual core problems can be found <b><A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=17906" target="_new">here</b></A>.
:tongue: <A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/priyajeet/fing.jpg" target="_new"><i><font color=red>Very funny, Scotty.</font color=red><font color=blue> Now beam down my clothes.</font color=blue></i></A> :tongue: <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by priyajeet on 10/16/04 05:04 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram