I recently upgraded my Intel dual core E6850 to an AMD 9350e because I wanted to see what the AMD's are actually like and I was surprised at just how good the AMD is. Yes the Intel scores better in benchmarks but in the real world the AMD seems to be faster than the Intel. For example I found the 9350e to be snappier in Vista, converts RAW files in photoshot faster and is heaps better at playing COD4 on a 24'' screen. Yes the Intel has a much higher maximum framerate in 3DMARK 05 and COD4 but I noticed the AMD has a more consistant framerate and is much smoother to play. In COD4 the Intel wasn't playable over 1680x1050 on medium settings but I am now playing at 1920x1280 with everything maxed out and it is still smoother than the intel at 1680x1050. That's a big difference when you consider the Intel has a %50 higher clock speed. The only change to the system was the board and processor so this is a very fair real world comparison. Also you can't say that I am an AMD fan boy because I actually have 3 intel dual core systems at home and I haven't owned an AMD since the Athlon 3500. Buy one for yourself and give it a go. The 9350e is dirt cheap and runs cool. Let me know if anyone else has had a similar experience.