Intel Graphics HD 4000 for a non-gaming laptop

Status
Not open for further replies.

zeevikma

Honorable
Dec 11, 2012
5
0
10,510
Hi,
Would Intel Graphics HD 4000 card, on a i7-3630QM, be good enough for working with Photoshop/Lightroom and occasional video transcoding? (providing I'm planning to keep the laptop for 4-5 years)
Or should I invest in Geforce GT 630M/635M?

Thank you.
 
Solution
For what you are doing the Intel HD 4000 is fine. If you use a video program that is Quick Sync compatible, the Intel HD 4000 helps dramatically decrease the time it takes to transcode video. When I say "dramatically" I mean by at least 6x faster than just with the CPU.

Dnx

Honorable
Nov 25, 2012
255
0
10,810
you should go for the one with the best card you can get, since laptops are hard to upgrade, and since you want to keep it for that long. if theres a chance get the 650m.
 

zeevikma

Honorable
Dec 11, 2012
5
0
10,510


Strange you say that...
From all the benchmarks/comparisons I checked, it looks like the GT 630 is about 1.5 times more powerful and GT 635 is 2 times more powerful, than the HD 4000
 

zeevikma

Honorable
Dec 11, 2012
5
0
10,510


Thanks for your reply.
That's what I figured. But do you think in the long run (4-5 years) I might be better off with 630/635? Coz, obviously it would be foolish to invest in a powerful laptop that, eventually, will have it's integrated graphics card as the bottleneck for properly running some future "ultra-graphical" Windows or a future Photoshop. Do you see what I'm saying?
 
G

Guest

Guest

in what? gaming?
in using solid works the difference is less than 5%
for what your doing . . .not worth it.

edit: i have been using photoshop for several years; there is no difference when i used a GT 8500, 9600 GT, 550ti or GTX 570. your rendering an image . . nothing taxing on any GPU.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.