I guess it could be relevant for someone still wanting to buy a 9900K, and expecting to get the fancy box. Of course, by this point, the 9900K is kind of a pointless product for anyone building a new system, and unless someone really wants to reuse their existing motherboard to upgrade from something like a 9600K, they would likely be better off picking up the slightly-better performing 10700K for over $100 less.a tomshardware story about a box. disappointing.
You're just not thinking like a dodecahedron. What they really needed was a dodecahedron-shaped cardboard box to ship these in, loaded into a dodecahedron-shaped shipping trailer. And they should be able to store efficiently, so long as you live in a geodesic dome.Gotta say, as someone that got not one but two of these dodecahedron packages, I'm happy they're going away.
Yes, the "packaging war" was ridiculous, I'd much prefer that they took the marketing-centric retail packaging R&D budget and put it into lowering retail prices. I'm fine with retail packaging that focuses on making sure the goods get to destination safely instead of being show pieces. If they still want the showy packaging, save it for Special/Limited Editions or something.I care a bit about the wastefulness aspect, but really they're just damned inconvenient to store anywhere. One cubit foot of space to ship a part that only needs about 1/50 that volume.