Err, it's from intel doc..
I'm still hoping for review by tom's (and other like TPU, anand, etc) about this..
is it sacrifice quality for speed or not..
edit: anyways going to read the article now...
From first look it seems it using much quicker/simpler AA.. that provide "good enough" quality..
In my point of view it that misleading,
the performance increase is from using "good enough" AA, not the usual AA..
I'm wondering how much the actual performance increase if u compare with old gen chip,
using the usual AA.. (this is what I'm hoping for from the review)
In other thought,
it's not like Intel is doing wrong.. (AMD and NVI already doing/using this for some time)