Finally, I would say, for a while my laptop wanted to retire but new stuff was just not compelling to do the jump. Gains were like 20% + nvme from 5y old laptop.Great news. AMD Vermeer will be great, their Cezanne sounds great, and Tiger Lake sounds great.
We are spoiled rotten from competition.
Thank you. Very interesting. You deserve a like .Intel Tiger Lake U first tests https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/214334613
There are also a bunch of leaks on Geekbench. For example, Intel Core i7-1185G7 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?utf8=✓&q=i7-1185G7&dir=desc&sort=multicore_score many of which are very recent (few days ago).. 😉
Thus do expect 8-core Intel Tiger Lake H to be roughly twice faster than Intel Tiger Lake U.. 🐯
<<Inappropriate content removed by moderator>>. Enjoy these 2 videos.https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/214334613
(a) The 1185G7 is not in the charts. The second-ranked 1165G7 is.
(b) Absolutely amazing that even the second-ranked sku has a single-core score in Cinebench R20 of 589. That is 11% faster than even an i9 10900K (which has the highest Cinebench score so far with 531 and that of course is achieved with a frequency of 5.3GHz). I imagine that the 1186G7 breaks the 600 boundary. Also in multicore the 1165G7 scores higher than a desktop 9600K. Not bad at all.
(c) Absolutely hilarious that the “15W” 4800U draws a whooping 63W during Cinebench. As I said and on another thread AMD is using smoke and mirrors with Renoir. Plug-in performance use unlimited power, then in battery mode where no reviewer benchmarks for scores drop clocks and power to 15W so that it looks good on battery benchmarks and we fool everyone that it was indeed 15W perfomance all along. Good trick, seems to be working on ignorant fanboys. Taking cheating on benchmarks to another level.
(d) Cinebench performance is largely academic anyway. Not only because the percentage of people using Cinema 4d is less than 0.001% but because CPU-only 3D rendering is becoming a thing of the past. Most other similar applications (e.g. Blender) have moved to offer a GPU-only rendering option that is vastly faster than even the fastest cpu-only rendering time. I haven’t seen a single 3D artist not using gpu-acceleration when provided. Moreover, even Maxon with the latest Cinema 4D R21 now offers natively the Maya Arnold renderer and this is the renderer of choice between 3D artists because it offers superior quality over Maxon’s own renderer (which is what is used in Cinebench R20). And Arnold on Maya now comes with GPU acceleration too. Even a year ago the GPU-only rendering quality was indistinguishable from the cpu-only rendering quality. See articles below.
Geekbench 5 is a solid CPU benchmark. It’s a proper all-round benchmark testing CPU performance in a variety of workloads. The 1185G7 scores 1610 in single core and 6113 in multicore. Again that single-core score is the highest we have ever seen so far sans extreme overclocking with liquid nitrogen. For reference the 10900K with its 5.3GHz single-core boost does around 1400. So that’s 15% faster than the 10900K. Also, the 4800U does only around 1150-1200 single core and 6400-6600 multicore. So, the 1185G7 is over 1/3 faster in single-core (and pretty much per core so it also has the faster 1T, 2T, 3T, 4T and even 5T-5.5T performance). The pure multithreaded performance is only 4.5%-7.5% lower. Not bad given it consumes over 30% less power.
And the fact that they didn't push the fact that they'll have 8 cores, and then they said "oh yeah, 4 cores are great" means that 8 cores won't be what they're pushing.In terms of multi-core, Intel is way behind. I'm sure Tiger Lake won't be a slouch, but at the same time, I doubt it'll be anywhere near the versatility of AMD's monster Ryzen CPU's, especially the 4000 series.
Intel Tiger Lake performance is much stronger than Intel Ice Lake, on top of much higher clockspeeds as well (up to 4.8GHz) that contributed very high single core score (which even surpasses desktop CPUs). Thus likely Intel Tiger Lake-U would be tops in the 4C/8T category. And looking at the Cinebench scores even matches AMD Ryzen 5 4500U with 6C/6T. 😎It is fair to say that Tiger Like is DEAD ON ARRIVAL.
Yep. If you look at that Chinese review the performance in graphics benchmarks for the igpu of the 1065G7 is 50% higher than that of the 4800U and the MX150. It is even 17.2% higher than that of the MX350 and only 4.5-9.5% slower than new MX450.IThat new Intel Xe integrated GPU now has discrete GPU level performance. Thus integrated GPU gaming may favor Intel Tiger Lake...
The cinebench R20 single core score of 583 is something else. That's not just slightly ahead, that's more than 10% higher than anything Intel or AMD is currently selling. When was the last time the per core performance crown was held by a low power mobile CPU?Found another one https://notebook.cz/clanky/recenze-notebook/2020/11-generace-intel-core-acer-swift-5-sf514-55t
Also 50% to 60% faster in the integrated GPU department according to that review. Would be interesting to see how the H-series will perform with 32 EUs..
Now you've mentioned it, this may be probably the first time a low power mobile CPU core outperformed any desktop CPU core.The cinebench R20 single core score of 583 is something else. That's not just slightly ahead, that's more than 10% higher than anything Intel or AMD is currently selling. When was the last time the per core performance crown was held by a low power mobile CPU?
The moderator once again edit my post because I used the L word to describe these "benchmarks" in my last post......
Can't compare IPC with different clocks.Results will vary depending on the cooling capability (and manufacturer's power settings) of the laptop being tested. That is a well known factor. The one from Chinese website probably had better cooling and more power headroom.
Most of those benchmark scores online are usually either on one run (best case) or average of multiple runs (typical case), and not after "15 minutes of intense load" which would have the laptop already heated up and having less thermal headroom. 🔥
The point here is that despite clockspeed disadvantage (compared to top desktop parts capable of 5.3GHz) and on a mobile platform (with typically less power headroom, limited cooling, higher memory latencies, etc), Intel's new Tiger Lake core shows a much higher IPC (ie. per clock) than all other current architectures from either Intel and AMD. 🤠
Thus imagine the performance of 8-cores in Intel's upcoming Tiger Lake H instead of just only 4-cores in current Intel Tiger Lake U chips...: