First details about Intel's Meteor Lake processor family emerge in a leak.
Intel Meteor Lake CPU Family Details Allegedly Leak : Read more
Intel Meteor Lake CPU Family Details Allegedly Leak : Read more
So you guys cover MLID’s leaks and rumors as well ? He has a solid track record for being unreliable. I mean don’t get me wrong though, but Tech outlets need to stop taking him seriously.
100%. I can't comment specifically on MLiD, but the general phenomenon of these folks posting leaks on social media is just bad news. There seems to be very few negative consequences for them spreading bad info. All the incentives seem pointed in the direction of more sensationalism, which only leads to more bad info, not less.Take what he and everyone like him says, with a truck load of salt. The problem is people like him create unfounded hype and spread questionable information.
That's a false dichotomy. It presumes they must post something. In the newspaper industry, it used to be poisonous to your reputation to traffic in gossip and sensationalism.Think of it like this: Which would you rather read, an (unreliable) rumor about CPUs, or more pieces on "butt-warming RPi" or "how to install a CPU"?
I never thought substack was for me, but the folks at SemiAnalysis seem to be doing some good work.It is what it is. Think of the trade-off: It's free.
That's letting them off the hook. It's too easy for people to get away with anything if you can just say "it's for entertainment". The fact is that people don't watch or read it for a good laugh - they read it because they want to be informed! That makes it news, whether or not it meets any standards of accuracy or bias.As for MLID, read it for entertainment. There's no need to take it or any rumor seriously.
Yeah, I quit watching his bull loooong ago. He just spews crap out, guarantees that he's got good intelligence, and then never mentions it again when he's shown to have been completely wrong.
Is he occasionally correct? Sure. But any of us here could probably make up a buncha tech rumor <Mod Edit> outta thing air and SOME of it would likely pan out. You throw a million darts at the wall, you're bound to hit the bullseye now and then.
No self-respecting tech site should be basing stories on anything he's said.
That's letting them off the hook. It's too easy for people to get away with anything if you can just say "it's for entertainment". The fact is that people don't read it for a good laugh - they read it because they want to be informed! That makes it news, whether or not it meets any standards of accuracy or bias.
What is this pap-per thing you are talking about?!That's a false dichotomy. It presumes they must post something. In the newspaper industry, it used to be poisonous to your reputation to traffic in gossip and sensationalism.
That depends on what sort of audience you have or are trying to cultivate.Also gossip and sensationalism has been a best selling thing in reporting and later TV for since forever.
Yellow journalism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Entertainment,? ,R u serious bro . This guy just creates a lot of hype and confusion and doesn't even know what he says without providing any backup.As for MLID, read it for entertainment. There's no need to take it or any rumor seriously.
No, it's always a good seller, what depends is if you want to do it for your publishing, if you want to attract "that sort of audience" and "that sort of audience" is who is doing the massive amounts of clicking.That depends on what sort of audience you have or are trying to cultivate.