Well, this is at best an ES, so nothing much to say here.
I'd just look at the horizontal scaling of the scores and try to draw a line instead by normalizing:
12900K: ~5%+ overall to productivity, ~5%- overall to creativity and ~2%+ overall to responsiveness.
5950X: ~1%+ overall to productivity, ~3%- overall to creativity and ~5%- overall to responsiveness.
ES: ~9%+ overall to productivity, ~13%- overall to creativity and ~9%- overall to responsiveness.
I've bolded the one I find interesting, as I think that implies the IPC gap between the CPUs across the BAPCo test suit (whatever they use). And then the responsiveness could mean how fast is the CPU at moving things around between the cores, which makes sense for Raptor Lake to have bigger latency overall, since it's adding even more slow cores.
There are some interesting things you can still extrapolate from this info and, following the lines of Alder Lake, RL may be another CPU with tradeoffs and heavy scheduler dependency (much like AMD's chiplet, but more).
Regards,