Intel Rules Chip Market: Share Jumps to a 10-Year High

Status
Not open for further replies.

trumpeter1994

Honorable
Mar 27, 2012
311
0
10,810
Good to see some market growth. I love Intel but I really think AMD needs to step there game up because the competition might help push the boundaries. Not to mention some price wars might be nice :p
 

Lord Captivus

Distinguished
Sep 13, 2011
139
0
18,680
Dispite what many are saying, I have to say that this market looks quiet good for consumers. You dont this in many industries.

The number 1 company "only" has 15.6% of total market, thats almost perfection.
And having 23 companies with almost 70% is amazing. Its a shame it doesnt say how many companies are "All Others", but still from my perspective this is very good maket distribution.

Of course we dont see if companies are dependant of each other or if a company in the list owns another company also from the list.
 

shafe88

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2010
854
1
19,015
[citation][nom]trumpeter1994[/nom]Good to see some market growth. I love Intel but I really think AMD needs to step there game up because the competition might help push the boundaries. Not to mention some price wars might be nice[/citation]
Give amd some time and they wiil. right now Amd and their bulldozer is like Intel and the pentium4.
 

spleenbegone

Distinguished
Feb 15, 2012
37
0
18,530
[citation][nom]ksampanna[/nom]Surprising ... considering that two days ago, Apple was expected to surprass Intel as the world's top "chip maker"[/citation]
Came here to post that. Looks like Apple might have some work to do.
 

trumpeter1994

Honorable
Mar 27, 2012
311
0
10,810
[citation][nom]shafe88[/nom]Give amd some time and they wiil. right now Amd and their bulldozer is like Intel and the pentium4.[/citation]
Even as an intel guy. I still just hope they don't continue to fall generations behind, but i do think there is meaning to what they say about bulldozer being in it's infancy. I hope so because as consumers we need the competition.
 

silverblue

Distinguished
Jul 22, 2009
1,199
4
19,285
[citation][nom]ksampanna[/nom]Surprising ... considering that two days ago, Apple was expected to surprass Intel as the world's top "chip maker"[/citation]
From the same author, no less.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Yeah, LOL, I was just about to post the Apple comment. It was simply one of the most ridiculous things I had ever heard. This just confirms it!
 

theuniquegamer

Distinguished
Sep 7, 2011
279
0
18,790
Amd can't compete intel with high end and performance cpu . Thats one of reason for this kind of monopoly in cpu market. But intel also makes some damn good cpus at very good price points.
 

kooldj

Distinguished
Oct 16, 2006
39
0
18,530
consider ivy bridge ur last cake. coz intel iz gna charge us hands n mouth when amd gets completely ripped
 

ph1sh55

Distinguished
Dec 29, 2011
38
0
18,530
kooldj- not likely when there is a consistent cost pressure from ARM chips. Downward cost pressure will only increase
 

trumpeter1994

Honorable
Mar 27, 2012
311
0
10,810
[citation][nom]gm0n3y[/nom]At least AMD beat the average market growth. I'm actually surprised by that.[/citation]
The ATI division of AMD is probably helping to contribute to that
 

madooo12

Distinguished
Dec 6, 2011
367
0
18,780
[citation][nom]Lord Captivus[/nom]Dispite what many are saying, I have to say that this market looks quiet good for consumers. You dont this in many industries.The number 1 company "only" has 15.6% of total market, thats almost perfection.And having 23 companies with almost 70% is amazing. Its a shame it doesnt say how many companies are "All Others", but still from my perspective this is very good maket distribution.Of course we dont see if companies are dependant of each other or if a company in the list owns another company also from the list.[/citation]
that's the whole semiconductor market, people are ususally talking about the x86 CPU or GPU market

even the whole CPU market isn't really looking good, controlled only by x86 and ARM
 

lordstormdragon

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2011
153
0
18,680
If you look carefully, the data here reflects only revenue, not chips sold. And of course Intel with the highest profit margin and most inflated prices would be on top. It would be interesting to see the per-chip data or per-sku data, however - not that Intel didn't sell a ton of chips, obviously! But just because there's always more to the story when statistics are involved. Always.
 

billj214

Distinguished
Jan 27, 2009
253
0
18,810
[citation][nom]lordstormdragon[/nom]If you look carefully, the data here reflects only revenue, not chips sold. And of course Intel with the highest profit margin and most inflated prices would be on top. It would be interesting to see the per-chip data or per-sku data, however - not that Intel didn't sell a ton of chips, obviously! But just because there's always more to the story when statistics are involved. Always.[/citation]

Good point but the total amount of chips can also be confusing, Intel makes CPU's, the most complicated and expensive of all chips produced, which compared to Samsung who produces a wide range of chips, most of which are not CPU's and use less die space can be cheaper but large volumes.
I think revenue is the key here and since Intel does not rely on other manufacturers to produce chips, they can increase profits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.