Intel Says It WILL Command the Respect of ARM

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]afrobacon[/nom]I don't know why, but I just really want to see Intel fail.[/citation]
Please step in line. There is a bigger queue than in front of "fresh to open apple stores" in front of you that don't know why but want to see Intel fail. And an even bigger queue that know why.
 
why would anyone want the chip-maker with the fastest CPU's fail? that would slow down chipset advances across the board...are you guys really that stupid?
 
[citation][nom]illo[/nom]why would anyone want the chip-maker with the fastest CPU's fail? that would slow down chipset advances across the board...are you guys really that stupid?[/citation]

intel isn't exactly starved for money, if they fail in one area they aren't gonna slow down their main cpu advances
 
He wears a beret AND a turtleneck, so he must be charismatic. LOL
 
Is it me or does the guy in the picture look like a New Age Fascist/Nazi wannabe? I would place him right into the Democrat party or the cabinet of Obozo, the Kenyan closet Muslim occupying the white house.
 
I'm glad Intel is branching out. I believe it is for everyone's benefit, since you know performance is going to increase dramatically once Intel's R&D hits that niche.
 
ARM is the superior architecture for this segment. Intel knows that which is why they use to have their own ARM chips back before they abandoned the segment and then came back with ATOM. Thing is, right now Intel has a superior manufacturing process (22nm and even their 32nm) which helps with the performance per watt and performance per die space. Dirk Meyer knew it too, but of course the AMD board didn't see it that way either 😛
 
[citation][nom]ReggieRay[/nom]Is it me or does the guy in the picture look like a New Age Fascist/Nazi wannabe? I would place him right into the Democrat party or the cabinet of Obozo, the Kenyan closet Muslim occupying the white house.[/citation] stfu and take your political views to foxnews
 
[citation][nom]marraco[/nom]Intel needs to throw away a lot of decades-old x86-compatibility.It hinders back x86.[/citation]

x86 built the world, why would they throw it away?
 
[citation][nom]ReggieRay[/nom]Is it me or does the guy in the picture look like a New Age Fascist/Nazi wannabe? I would place him right into the Democrat party or the cabinet of Obozo, the Kenyan closet Muslim occupying the white house.[/citation]

Is it me or do I see a great future in the burger flipping industry for you?
 
... nokia felt too, that there is no worries... nokia waz the biggest name in smartphone space, now? NOT!!! taken out by apple and google... but they used an ARM based CPU... nVidia+ARM=TEGRA... and there will be a partnership between ARM+AMD=???
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-fusion-developer-conference-arm-apu,12650.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/x86-AMD-Fusion-Warren-East-John-Taylor-ARM,12673.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/mobile-processor-cpu-gpu-arm-cpu,12670.html
... intel maybe build powerful CPU's but the future is in GPGPU... and intel haz nothing in that space...
 
[citation][nom]DjEaZy[/nom]... nokia felt too, that there is no worries... nokia waz the biggest name in smartphone space, now? NOT!!! taken out by apple and google... but they used an ARM based CPU... nVidia+ARM=TEGRA... and there will be a partnership between ARM+AMD=??? http://www.tomshardware.com/news/a [...] 12650.htmlhttp://www.tomshardware.com/news/x [...] 12673.htmlhttp://www.tomshardware.com/news/m [...] 12670.html... intel maybe build powerful CPU's but the future is in GPGPU... and intel haz nothing in that space...[/citation]

w...t...f...
(random link)
(random link)
(random link)
... irrelevant comment...
 
[citation][nom]memadmax[/nom]x86 built the world, why would they throw it away?[/citation]

So did mud bricks, back in early civilization, but you don't see too many people using it today. Wood and concrete work so much better.

ARM is efficient. that's the big advantage. Sure, it probably wouldn't do too well at high performance PCs, but I'd love to have several ARM based domain controllers around, (that would cut our power costs considerably) and they'd work well for internet surfing machines.
 
The x86 instruction set is enormous compared to arm.s risc architecture and that size means more silicone wasted on now legacy instructions. So yeah it needs so trimming along it's edges to be competitive. A manufacturing process can take u only so much before the ugly head of inefficiency shows it's true self in the mobile department.
 
[citation][nom]illo[/nom]w...t...f...(random link)(random link)(random link)... irrelevant comment...[/citation]
... links are not random... just read and think... it's about why AMD+ARM... in context with ARM+nVidia... they are partnering with ARM... intel is not... but intel thinks, that ARM is a serious competition... there is another link... food for thought...
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Project-Denver-ARM-MacBook-Cortex-A15-Tri-Gate,12711.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/apple-intel-future-roadmap-macbook,12780.html
... read the articles and you may see the connections and dangers for intel...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom